Marxist Praxis

Die Marxistische Praxis Der Freimaurerischen Allgemeinen Systemtheorie Des Dielektrischen Dialektischen Materialismus.

1.0. The General Postulate of Marx’s Materialist Dialectical Conception rests upon the objective consideration of the sum total of reciprocal relations of all the elements [i.e. classes] in a given field [i.e. state, society], and, consequently, the objective stage of development of that field in the context of other known fields, with due regard to their operative laws of dynamic motion.

1.1. Dialectical Materialism is the doctrine of motion as the [essential] mode of existence of matter, caused by the unity of force in opposition (i.e. dielectric polarization; Sami-Tawi).

1.2. Dialectical Materialism is “the science of the general laws of motion, both of the external [material] world and of human thought [the latter being nothing more than the reflection of the former in the human mind. In contrast, though ungrounded in material reality becomes ideal; metaphysical].”

1.3. Dialectics is a form of materialism that examines society in motion both backwards and forwards.

1.4. Dialectics is a form of idealism which materializes into the “development by leaps, catastrophes, revolutions” from thesis to synthesis via antithesis. As such, any matter which is may be negated by what it will be, which “be-coming” again negates its own negation and leads into progressive or regressive stages of development.

1.5. Marx’s doctrine of political economy is merely the materialization of the greater general systemtheory of the dynamics of nature, [which, in its elementary materiality, operates according to an absolute and ideal scientific doctrine].

1.6 Marx’s view on the relationship between freedom and necessity [i.e. survival] … means the recognition of objective law in nature [Ma’at] and of the dialectical transformation of necessity into freedom (viz. the transformation of the potentially knowable “essence of things” into “phenomena”). This philosophy of materialism accounts for (1) the electrical theory of matter, (2) the historical dialectic of material development, and (3) the importance of revolutionary practical activity [praxis] in the complex [i.e. historical processes] of social relations viz. “human essence.”

1.7. Dialectics as the doctrine of development: “the inner impulses of development, imparted by the contradiction and conflict of the various forces and tendencies acting on a given body, or within a given phenomenon, or within a given society; — the interdependence and the closest, indissoluble connection of all sides of every phenomenon … a connection that provides a uniform, law-governed, universal process of motion.”

2.0. Dialectic, as an adjective (or noun), means “interpenetrating opposites” (which, as a linguistic concept, invites contradiction and conflation on both syntactic and semantic grounds). Simply put, it verbs, or moves from known to unknown to make known.

2.1. To consider dialectics at all is to confront head on every notion of finality, absolutism, and sacrosanctity, which, for any “state,” would mean confronting its own negation as it’s known; “a break in continuity.”

3.0. The Materialist Conception of History: “a scientific study of history as a uniform and law-governed process in all its immense variety and contradictoriness.”

3.1. Marx’s science of society, along materialist lines, explains social consciousness as the outcome of social being.

3.2. there is a distinction between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production [economic structure] and the ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out [legal, political superstructure].

4.0. Struggle toward the equitable sharing of “resources” across a field or society.

5.0. Dielectric Material: material having the capacity to store energy via polarization of its field.

5.1. The very material upon which a scientific philosophy of Dialectics is based.

5.2. The quantity and quality of elementary matter is base 2, or binary, viz, negative and positive [0 and 1], the equilibrium of which “opposing forces” produce the synthetic unity, or the so-called neutral.

5.3. Energy moves through a material via the transmission of discrete quanta across the valence shells of discrete material elements in the form of heat; if force is applied in both directions then the current of energy will continuously alternate throughout the material as opposed to requiring a continuous supply of power from one polarity.

5.4. “…dielectric is used to indicate the energy storing capacity of the material (by means of polarization). A common example of a dielectric is the electrically insulating material between the metallic plates of a capacitor. The polarization of the dielectric by the applied electric field increases the capacitor’s surface charge for the given electric field strength.”

5.5. “I conceived the rotating matter to be the substance of certain cells, divided from each other by cell-walls composed of particles which are very small compared with the cells, and that it is by the motions of these particles, and their tangential action on the substance in the cells, that the rotation is communicated from one cell to another.” (Maxwell)

5.5.1 Maxwell was driving at magnetization even though the same introduction clearly talks about dielectric polarization (viz. displacement current). He concluded that “light consists of transverse undulations in the same medium that is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena.”

5.6. Dielectric polarization, i.e. binary storage, is the same mechanism by which the bit elements of computing systems operate.

5.7 social equity or inequity results from the dielectric polarization of bodies in a field.

6.0. General Postulate: the General Systemtheory of Fluid Dynamics, as postulated in both Dielectric and Dialectic Materialism are consubstantial systems of natural law developed in the same time and place and by the same hidden hands.