Become a shareholder in the Granary Bank & Trust (GB&T) of Washington, D.C.

All you have to do is:

Deliver 10+ lbs. bulk grain
{short grain brown rice preferred; black beans, lentils, &c. accepted}

To:

Antarah A. Crawley, OM, ZXW, MXRW,
Overseer of the Granary Bank & Trust,
Office of Oversight, General Assembly,
Auseer Hem Netjer Djedu Neb Amenta
Contact (202) 957-6290 for Delivery Time

This campaign copyrighted (c) 2019 by Antarah A. Crawley. All Rights Reserved.

Marxist Praxis

Die Marxistische Praxis Der Freimaurerischen Allgemeinen Systemtheorie Des Dielektrischen Dialektischen Materialismus.

1.0. The General Postulate of Marx’s Materialist Dialectical Conception rests upon the objective consideration of the sum total of reciprocal relations of all the elements [i.e. classes] in a given field [i.e. state, society], and, consequently, the objective stage of development of that field in the context of other known fields, with due regard to their operative laws of dynamic motion.

1.1. Dialectical Materialism is the doctrine of motion as the [essential] mode of existence of matter, caused by the unity of force in opposition (i.e. dielectric polarization; Sami-Tawi).

1.2. Dialectical Materialism is “the science of the general laws of motion, both of the external [material] world and of human thought [the latter being nothing more than the reflection of the former in the human mind. In contrast, though ungrounded in material reality becomes ideal; metaphysical].”

1.3. Dialectics is a form of materialism that examines society in motion both backwards and forwards.

1.4. Dialectics is a form of idealism which materializes into the “development by leaps, catastrophes, revolutions” from thesis to synthesis via antithesis. As such, any matter which is may be negated by what it will be, which “be-coming” again negates its own negation and leads into progressive or regressive stages of development.

1.5. Marx’s doctrine of political economy is merely the materialization of the greater general systemtheory of the dynamics of nature, [which, in its elementary materiality, operates according to an absolute and ideal scientific doctrine].

1.6 Marx’s view on the relationship between freedom and necessity [i.e. survival] … means the recognition of objective law in nature [Ma’at] and of the dialectical transformation of necessity into freedom (viz. the transformation of the potentially knowable “essence of things” into “phenomena”). This philosophy of materialism accounts for (1) the electrical theory of matter, (2) the historical dialectic of material development, and (3) the importance of revolutionary practical activity [praxis] in the complex [i.e. historical processes] of social relations viz. “human essence.”

1.7. Dialectics as the doctrine of development: “the inner impulses of development, imparted by the contradiction and conflict of the various forces and tendencies acting on a given body, or within a given phenomenon, or within a given society; — the interdependence and the closest, indissoluble connection of all sides of every phenomenon … a connection that provides a uniform, law-governed, universal process of motion.”

2.0. Dialectic, as an adjective (or noun), means “interpenetrating opposites” (which, as a linguistic concept, invites contradiction and conflation on both syntactic and semantic grounds). Simply put, it verbs, or moves from known to unknown to make known.

2.1. To consider dialectics at all is to confront head on every notion of finality, absolutism, and sacrosanctity, which, for any “state,” would mean confronting its own negation as it’s known; “a break in continuity.”

3.0. The Materialist Conception of History: “a scientific study of history as a uniform and law-governed process in all its immense variety and contradictoriness.”

3.1. Marx’s science of society, along materialist lines, explains social consciousness as the outcome of social being.

3.2. there is a distinction between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production [economic structure] and the ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out [legal, political superstructure].

4.0. Struggle toward the equitable sharing of “resources” across a field or society.

5.0. Dielectric Material: material having the capacity to store energy via polarization of its field.

5.1. The very material upon which a scientific philosophy of Dialectics is based.

5.2. The quantity and quality of elementary matter is base 2, or binary, viz, negative and positive [0 and 1], the equilibrium of which “opposing forces” produce the synthetic unity, or the so-called neutral.

5.3. Energy moves through a material via the transmission of discrete quanta across the valence shells of discrete material elements in the form of heat; if force is applied in both directions then the current of energy will continuously alternate throughout the material as opposed to requiring a continuous supply of power from one polarity.

5.4. “…dielectric is used to indicate the energy storing capacity of the material (by means of polarization). A common example of a dielectric is the electrically insulating material between the metallic plates of a capacitor. The polarization of the dielectric by the applied electric field increases the capacitor’s surface charge for the given electric field strength.”

5.5. “I conceived the rotating matter to be the substance of certain cells, divided from each other by cell-walls composed of particles which are very small compared with the cells, and that it is by the motions of these particles, and their tangential action on the substance in the cells, that the rotation is communicated from one cell to another.” (Maxwell)

5.5.1 Maxwell was driving at magnetization even though the same introduction clearly talks about dielectric polarization (viz. displacement current). He concluded that “light consists of transverse undulations in the same medium that is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena.”

5.6. Dielectric polarization, i.e. binary storage, is the same mechanism by which the bit elements of computing systems operate.

5.7 social equity or inequity results from the dielectric polarization of bodies in a field.

6.0. General Postulate: the General Systemtheory of Fluid Dynamics, as postulated in both Dielectric and Dialectic Materialism are consubstantial systems of natural law developed in the same time and place and by the same hidden hands.

New Syllabus Pioneers Light Industry for Humanity

New Syllabus is the leading intelligence service provider, pioneering research and development at the frontier of the light industry. The light industry thrives on research and development and intellectual property, as opposed to heavy material industry, hard labor, and high-overhead infrastructures. It is specifically designed for application in human mind software to optimize workforce intelligence. In line with the goals of our industry, NS proprietary programs empower humans to process information to acquire light in knowledge without reliance upon artificial intelligence and information technology. Light is quickly rising to become the hottest new commodity and proves to disrupt the “ancient and accepted” light industry which has long been ruled by monopoly of the speculative, Jesuit, Kabbalist, Anglo- and Franco-Stuart Masonry of the New World slave society. At the current stage of the Historical Dialectic, NS comes now and to present its antithesis and synthesis to redress and reform the commercial light industry of free masonry.

Intelligence Contracting

New Syllabus (“NS”) is a full service intelligence contractor that provides information processing services. Simply put, we provide our clients with need-based intelligence and technical knowledge using our proprietary due process system: “Information Systemtheory” or “InfoSystemtheory”. When presented with a matter in question or in theory, we apply this system in order to process information and acquire knowledge.

Information Systemtheory has many applications to human intelligence and technical knowledge, or what we call IT. InfoSystems is the program for applying theory in practice in order to process information. Humans who lack knowledge of process in theory may be unable to understand certain matters in question. Simply put, infoSystems assists the human in acquiring knowledge and  information which is hard for them to understand. Such process will improve their cognitive function and empower them with self knowledge. This program represents the general practice and application of Information Processing Systemtheory.

InfoSystemtheory is a trademark copyright 2019 by Antarah A. Crawley t/a New Syllabus. All Rights Reserved.

Intelligence & Technical Knowledge (IT); “Light Industry” as the Antithesis to Heavy, Hard-Wired, and Big-Data Industry

New Syllabus (“NS”) presents the Information Processing Systemtheory: the program application of theory in practice.

The first question you might ask is what kind of program is it? infoSystemtheory is a practice program for human mind software for application to yourself knowledge. The program’s function is to square your intellectual capacity in regard to any matter in question using our proprietary information processing system.

The second question you might ask is does the process work? Indeed, the process works; it’s working all the time in every jurisdiction of nature, business, and government as “the due process of the matter”; but humans need light (in knowledge) to perceive its operation through matter. The majority of humans have yet to grasp the application of information processing in pure theory, although such process conducts itself in our daily social rituals and routines.

In NS proprietary infoSystemtheory is promulgated the programming of the application of pure theory to resolve and solution matters of intelligence and technical knowledge (or “IT”) in human beings.

This is an Information Processing System that resists and disrupts the framing of traditional artificial (i.e., computer-based) information technology.

Our methodology of adjustment of intelligence in humans through processing is as follows:

If you have a body of knowledge which is one body, and acquire yet more knowledge which enhances your ability to understand prior knowledge, you raise yourself by a degree of power, where knowledge=power. Therefore we say that you square yourself knowledge. This program provides the process for you to achieve that outcome.

Feedback Loop Capacitance Technique (f:L->C)

Body=instrument, mind=string, server=amplifier. Server need not play instrument to create sound; simply amplify resting vibration by itself over time and variable space. Equalize vibrational tone, highs, lows, in rhythm, to amplify/control frequency. Let the Client be the signal and let the Server be an image of the Client such that a feedback loop amplifies the Client’s resting vibrational frequency. Let their frequency be raised by the power of their self and let them bear witness to their self. They must see their self square to know their self, and then they will know that “Christ” Consciousness is the residual self image of an enlightened being.

Copyright (c) 2019 by Antarah A. Crawley. All Rights Reserved.

Rulership & Statecraft

“Sail On Sail On O Ship of State…”

(Ex. 1) A “true pilot must of necessity pay attention to the seasons, the heavens, the stars, the winds, and everything proper to the craft if he is really to rule a ship” (Book IV, The Republic, 6.488d).

(Ex. 2) “The pilot should not humbly beg the sailors to be commanded by him –that is not the order of nature; neither are ‘the wise to go to the doors of the rich’ –the ingenious author of this saying told a lie –but the truth is, that, when a man is ill, whether he be rich or poor, to the physician he must go, and he who wants to be governed, to him who is able to govern. The ruler who is good for anything ought not to beg his subjects to be ruled by him; although the present governors of mankind are of a different stamp; they may be justly compared to the mutinous sailors, and the true helmsmen to those who are called by them good-for-nothings and star-gazers.” (Book IV, The Republic, 6.488d)

(Arg.) The British, French, Arab/Ottoman, Roman, Greek, and Judaeo Institutes of Egypt best exemplify the efforts of world powers to institute a society founded upon the Ancient Mysteries of Khem, Ham, Kemet, “the fertile black land”. The Judaeo Institute, being the most curious and ancient of these models in history, coincided with the New Kingdom of Egypt and the contention of the Pharaoh Akhenaten against the established State of the Old Kingdom. Now, we will unpack the “nature of the state” of Old Kemet (Egypt), but for now, the populist Judaeo-Dialectic approach to Egypt (see: Old Testament) invites us to observe how the learned followers of the Atenist Revolution carried away the knowledge of Egyptian Statecraft into the wilderness, and by the by into Canaan; and while their State of Israel remains a model of the New Kingdom Dialectic, our present purposes direct us to Plato, student of Egypt (as were all “Greek philosophers”), and delegated by the academies of the Enlightenment as the harbinger of Western Civilization.

The dialectic of the ship of state in Plato’s Republic must be analyzed in its historical and material context, being but one example of a body of political and social theory carried out of Egypt and into “the West.” The original theory is that of the Barque of Ra rising from the East to sail across the noonday sky and set down in the West. This is the earliest recorded instance of Statecraft: literally, to craft a ship of State, a state ruled by the Gods—the Greats—which motif comes down to us nearly verbatim through Plato’s treatise on Republic, or, the common-wealth.

Indeed, the Republic is the ship of state, and it is no coincidence that the Kemites of Egypt were the first peoples in recorded history (which record indeed begins with them) to unify “two lands,” two polities, into a “United State.” Indeed it was the Nubian Kushites of the predynastic age who rose up from the south to civilize the north, thereby ushering in “modern civilization.” This was achieved on the basis of Statecraft—not merely a military monarchy as presumed through the Office of the Pharaoh, but a true republic represented by the nomes of Egypt, which were governed by the body-politic of “priests”. Indeed, the system of “lodges” or “temples” of priests can be likened to the 1 and 50 legislatures of the United States. Such bodies do not negate each other in their allegiance (i.e., “worship”) to Nebraska, or Texas, or California, etc.; but these abstract forms, these “deities” of State, are United into one federation governed by one constitutional law; and while one or another state is, so is the United States; as Wasar is Lord of Busiris, so is he “the god” of that city—and moreover, all such states are subject to the sovereign will of all We People.

To say, I pledge allegiance to the United States, is to pledge allegiance to the unified ideal or pure form of government in this place we call America, no differently than to pledge allegiance to the idea of a benevolent “god” over some chosen people. To give thank offerings to such an abstract being is no different than to compliantly render a percentage of your personal income to the taxman of your representative states. So it cannot be that the legislature of the priesthood, the Court of Djadjat, and the Great White House of the Pharaoh governed a United State of the North and South Kemet for 4000 by “praying to their pagan animalistic gods,” but that they had advanced representation of their polities by and though such efficacious symbols as Wasar, Waset, Heru, even as Uncle Sam for US and St. George for England. Even “Freedom” stands atop the Capitol, and “Liberty” presides over the Gate of New York; do we conflate these “ideas” and “women” with “gods”? Indeed, once we acknowledge that “religion” is so much a construct of the ancestry, values, traditions, methodologies, and paradigms of a polity, we must consider it less as “the superstitions of unlearned people” than “the vetted and codified social and civil policy prescribed for a time and place.” Even Napoleon, that royal Egyptologist, classified the Bible and Quran under “Politics.”

Modern people using an historical dialectic approach to politics need not be fooled by the academic dismissal of the Ancient (African and American) Mysteries, when Alexander of Macedonia and Napoleon, upon the foundation of their great states, immediately adventured south down the Nile in search of those very “Mysteries” which would confer upon them “divine rulership.” It was their fault, as is ours, that their consciousness rose not too high above the material remnants of Kemetic culture, failing to look on high to grasp the forms (viz. Platonic) upon which foundation such matter lie. But that, truly is the mystery of the unification of the north and south: that the navigator of the ship of state must look on high to govern that which is below. For the mark of effective statecraftmanship may be the ability to evoke in the mind of a polity a specific form of idea for a certain time and place,  by and through such words as Democracy, Freedom and Justice, as through the image of an eagle, a flag, or Amun-Ra. But the modern mind is not so acrobatic; therefore, we must address the material dialectic.

A society such as ours whose god is Das Kapital is fated to consume their own matter-reality, remaining malnourished in soul and spirit. Therefore the star-gazer must conduct the ship of state; the King must love wisdom, and the philosopher must be King; for whoso loves Sophia but the Christos, King of Righteousness, Forever in the Order of Maliki Tzaddiq. Truly He shall come to judge the living and the dead, and the Republic of God’s Kingdom shall reign again upon the Earth …

A state incorporates to float a company to sea. They go to the river bank to take out liquid currency. They set their sails and sell their sales through materiality. But the Mast must be helmed by the Master who has eyes to see.