Category: CAM
Sapientia No. 2
POLICY BUREAU SAPIENTIAL DOCUMENT NO. 002 – JULY 24, 2020
A BILL
To establish the historical continuity of light and liberty among colored people.
Be it adjudged by the Policy Bureau of the People’s Body Politic, That Freimaurerei, or free masonry, is the practice of design-build construction in earth, wood, and stone by a body politic of free and willing laborers. The first stone masons were led by the state vizier (high chancellor), the Overseer of the Work of Ra at Awnu (Heliopolis), Imhotep (He Comes In Peace), at the building of the Mer (pyramid) of Nesutbity (King) Djoser at Saqqarah in 2670-2650 B.C. (3rd Dynasty). These civil servants were employed in the work of the state (per ah).
SEC. 2. The term “mer”, represented by a triangle or pyramid-shaped metu neter, signifies the place of light and love, or, physically, a place where energy coagulates into a “spiritual fire”. It is said that the ancient builders of earth and stone mounds, or “meru”, were themselves called “mer” or “maur”, from whence the national epithet “Ta-meri”, land of love and light.
SEC. 3. It is known that the people of this black fertile land (Kemet), which is upon the Flesh of the Ka of Ra (Afu Ra Ka), came up from Napata (Nubia) which is in the place of the origin of Hapi (the Nile River). On the annual inundation of Hapi, the river fertilizes the soil of the black land to bring forth an abundant harvest, a tenth of which is offered to the Netjeru (Nature) in thanksgiving of the harvest cycle. The people came up from the “South”, which is the North insofar as the origin of the waters of creation, from whence issued the Netjeru, from whence issued humanity, on the Unification of the 36 nomes of the North and South at the First Dynasty under Nesutbity Menes (Narmer) circa 3150 B.C..
SEC. 4. Upon the destruction of Ta-meri, also known as Kemet, in 330 B.C., whence Alexander, Aristotle, and the Macedonian-Greek Imperium began the rape and pillage of the land and culture which would be “Egypt”, the nobility of Nubian-descendant natives migrated to the West of Africa, then sailed aloft to the Far West, also known as Al’Maghreb Al’Aqsa, to Al’Morocco (or Al’Mecca, or Olmexica) or Al’Merika, meaning “the land of the Ka of Meri” — America.
SEC. 5. It is known that between Nubia and America the Noble Meri, or Mauri, settled and peopled Ethiopia, Canaan (Palestine and Phoenicia), India, Australia, Eurasia; Tartary, Mongolia, Manchuria, Brittany Ireland Scotland Normandy Germany and Iberia. The Mauri begot people throughout these lands.
SEC. 6. There were, also, pale-skinned cave people who had lived in these lands according to strange custom, and, due to their isolation from the climate of “love”, regressed genetically from the dominant humanity. Thus when the dominant Meri contacted them again, they were wont for Maurish learning. Therefore, again, out of “love”, the Mari learned the northern pupils in institutions which came to be known as schools and lodges.
SEC. 7. The schools graduated nobler pale-skin people, who became a nobility unto themselves, and assumed a divine right of kingship like unto the ancient Pharaonic model propounded by the Mauri. Of the noble Mauri there was a class of very stable and established masters known as Djedi, from which root, “djed”, cometh the sign of the column. Yet others were a high priestly class called the Djyahudists, or Priests of Djahudi, from which cometh the appellation of that nation who all bare witness to the Lord, Yahudi. The students of these teachers, naturally, assumed their names.
SEC. 8. It is said that, since the beginning of these pale-skinned people, they were predisposed to war against the dominant humanity by their disposition of father Yaqob, or Jacob, also known as James, a brother of original humanity, who went astray for wont of power sometime before the Unification of the North and South. Yaqob progenated a league of nations and sent these children to the north where they incubated their bickering isolationist tendencies and recessive genetics for millennia, until they were sufficiently pathological enough to begin their assault on humanity in the first Intermediary Period of Kemet, thus beginning the World War which has not waned to this day.
SEC. 9. The warring and isolationist disposition of these pale northerners caused them to, over time, exploit the knowledge passed to them by the Mauri in order to — again — conquer the Mauri and rape their land, bodies, and culture, as was and is the trend of patriarchal hunter-gathering-herding societies of the European type. (Such a philosophy is summarized in the Judaic impetus for “dominion.” This is in contrast to the Moro-Kemetic philosophy of the union of opposing forces, or “smai-tawi.”) The wisdom got from the sack of the Greek and, later, Roman colonization of Kemet was largely lost at the fall of that Empire when the Arab/Ottomans predominated over the Holy Land, thus entering Europe into the “Dark Ages” until traveling Mauri make intellectual contact with them. These pale-skins then emerge from these “Dark Ages” with a newfound knowledge and sense of superiority.
SEC. 10. Ferdinand and Isabela claim to successfully expel the Mauri from Europe in 1492, thus symbolically beginning the great offense against the Maurish lands, peoples, and cultures from the East (Asia and Africa) to the West (the Americas). This sustained offense is called the Maafa. The Maafa was carried out by and through the kidnapping, bonding, and trade of Mauri and the exploitation of their natural resources in both Africa and the Americas (because these are the two major continents to which Mauri are the native and autochthonous populations).
SEC. 11. In the course of this war waged by Yaqob and his pale skinned minions, it was imperative to dispossessed the Mauri of their nobility in order to reduce them to chattel material for trade. This was done by the invention of the Aryan Model of Hellenophily by Karl Otfried Muller at the University of Gottingen in Germany in the 1820s. In contrast to the Ancient Model, which logically asserted that the Greek culture arose as a result of colonization (c. 1500 B.C.) by Egyptians and Phoenicians who had civilized the native inhabitants, the Aryan Model proposed, with baseless audacity, that there was not any continuity between “Egypt” and “Greece”.
SEC. 12. This basic assertion severs the lineage all colored people claim to the development of Greek philosophy and thought, which itself forms the sole foundation of Western European academic supremacy. Without the outpouring of essentially Ancient African thought into the Cradel of Western Civilization, the pale people can assert that all the colored people of the world new ignorant as monkeys and apt to be slaved.
SEC. 13. Whereas the Germans, in all their sophistication, (in addition to stealing and recapitulating ancient smai-tawian philosophy into Greek, Kantian, Hegelian and Marxist Dialectic) were the scholastic ruffians to deal the deathblow to King Kham-ur Ausar, Hiram Abiff, it is in the German language that we may perceive the linkage between the people whom the sun loved (Mauri, copper-colored people) and the ancient mound-builders of the world: a free people … a working people … a self-made people: A Maurerischen People.
SEC. 14. It behooves all colored people to study the philosophy which has served as the foundation of such essentially scholastic and ethical societies as the Freemasons, Oddfellows, and Rosicruicians, keeping in mind the perversity of their legion, because it was our Maurerische ancestors who first propounded it.
SEC. 15. In conclusion, true liberty is the freedom to roam and feely engage one’s body in labor in exchange for gainful wages. Let all those having competence and ability to do work come in and go out of the state house (per ah) in performance thereof according to all of the forms of their desire; for Love is the Law, Love under Will, to do Ma’at on Earth, as it is in Heaven. Amen.
Sapientia No. 1
POLICY BUREAU SAPIENTIAL DOCUMENT No. 001. JULY 19, 2020.
A BILL
To establish a moral and ethical philosophy.
Be it adjudged by the Policy Bureau of the People’s Body Politic, How good and how pleasant it is for friends to dwell together in union, when each extends a hand, embracing love and light, and speak truly of things on earth and in the hereafter; to visit the sick, relieve the distressed, bury the dead, and teach the youth. How odd it is in a world of wrong to do what is right. Therefore, the self-made man is said to be his own past master.
SEC. 2. Regarding the Constitution of the Self, these are the elements constituting the self, and their meanings:
- Soma: body; physic;
- Nous: reason; logos, intellect; conscious mind;
- Psyche: soul; heart; unconscious (ie the parts of the self of which the self is not conscious).
SEC. 3. The means, or method, by which the self applies abstract knowledge to practice is as follows:
Dialectic: (a) the process of making known what is unknown; (b) a philosophical method describing the discursive-rational-intuitive process by which oneself individualizes itself, which is to say, becomes aware of, or able to recognize, itself as an entity of and apart from its environs (mere animals being integrally a part of their environs without the self-awareness to chose otherwise). [See, SEC. 6]
SEC. 4. It is said, Great is Justice (Wr Maat); that is to say, of paramount importance is the concept of order, universal balance (harmony), cosmic regulation (of force-in-opposition), justice (justness), truth (materiality), truth-in-justice (equity), rectitude and moral uprightness (righteousness and good standing). Ma’at brings peace (hetep) and condemns crime (djayit) and evil (djut), for whosoever breaks the law (hepu) is punished (khsf). Surely that law is that which is articulated in truth (maa kheru). This is to say, the concept of Ma’at applies on:
- The universal level, in which it expresses the harmony of the elements and bodies as clearly established, each in its right place as an ordered whole;
- The political level, in which it expresses the pursuit of justice, equity, truth, and rightness in the dispensation of the law; and
- The individual level, in which it expresses the rules for living in concert with moral principles of balance, harmony, and the golden rule, for the most accomplished, useful and appropriate human actions are circumscribed in the cosmological order.
SEC. 5. Regarding the Rules of Ma’at which apply to the individual, There are Seven Ethical Virtues, marks of Noble character, rich in Value as fine Jewels. The first three are ecclesiastical (See, 1 Corinthians 13:13) and the last four are cardinal (See, Niomachean Ethic of Aristotle and Republic of Plato Book IV, 426–435, etc.). They are:
- Friendship, and Charity: to dwell together in union and extend a helping hand to those in need. Sign: hand in hand.
- Love, and Hope: to treat others as oneself; to maintain hope in humanity. Sign: heart in hand.
- Truth, and Faith: that which accords to reality; faith means to vouchsafe your trust in the process of divine nature. Sign: hand over eyes.
- Temperance, or continentia: to exercise restraint; self control, self mastery; soundness of mind. Sign: hotep (peace offering) [Ii em Htp, Who Comes In Peace]; and
- Fortitude, or fortitudo: to exercise courage and strength. Sign: djed (stabilizing column) [Djedi, Who Is Established].
- Prudence, or prudentia: to exercise discernment; wisdom; Sophia; sapientia. Sign: wudjat (eye of providence) [Useer, Who Seeth Clearly]; and
- Justice, or iustitia: to exercise equity and righteousness; or that which concords with the law. Sign: ma’at (ostrich plume) [Maa’khru, Who Speaketh Truth].
SEC. 6. Regarding the Ethical Virtues of Maat, and their application in practice, the “dianoetic virtue” of critical thought entails development and progress as a result of some kind of learning process. This is to say, virtue can be taught as a subject of instruction. A teacher may focus the students attention by using proverbs and maxims. This moral system constitutes a scholarly discipline. It is a pedagogy of teaching, complete with a methodology for learning, that is, for processing information.
dianoetic (ˌdaɪənəʊˈɛtɪk)
adj
- (Philosophy) of or relating to thought, esp to discursive reasoning rather than intuition.
- relating to the operation of the mind through logical rather than intuitive thought processes; intellectual activity.
- proceeding to a conclusion by reason or argument rather than intuition; (synonym) discursive.
- (Philosophy) the rational investigation of questions about existence and knowledge and ethics.
- (logical) capable of or reflecting the capability for correct and valid reasoning; “a logical mind”.
[from Greek dianoētikos, from dianoia the thinking process, an opinion, from dia- + noein to think]
SEC. 7. A method (tep-heseb) is an abstract model of the correct procedure to be performed with regard to any matter in question, which is to say, the best example for demonstrating a logical process, or any other intellectual procedure, with exactitude. The method takes into account the best, correct procedure. Method involves the right way. It is said that thoughtful speech teaches the ignorant about knowledge, science, and the method of eloquence (tches seba khem er rehk tep-heseb en medet neferet). A synonym is algorithm; or knowledge in practice. Furthermore it is said, stick to the facts; do not exaggerate. In the last analysis, what prevails is Ma’at. Only the will of almighty God, ruler of the universe, comes to pass. The wishes of human beings do not always come true. Therefore man proposes, and God disposes. The disposition of any matter of nature is with God; but it is wise to control oneself by moderating ones heart.
SEC. 8. The body of god (netjer), whose members are all gods (netjeru), is like the body of the king (nesubity), whose members are an assembly of the bodies assembled therein. Now when the King — life prosperity and health (ankh wudja seneb) be upon him — assembles towns into districts and districts into nomes and nomes of the south with those of the north into one federation, its is like the great god who created himself out of the one who preceded him (Nun), and fashioned for himself his own members. The self-created god (kheper djesef) dwells in and over the divine nature (pautiu netjeru), as the sovereign king dwells in and over the state (per ah), his many members governing his many domains. It is said, the prime minister (tchaty, djedi) in the pharaonic (per ah) administrative establishment summons his children in order to teach them virtue. This love facilitates the dissemination of moral and spiritual instruction, whose mission is to do Ma’at on earth as it is in heaven.
SEC. 9. Let them go in and come out of the Land of the Blessed Dead (Duat) and join the Venerable Deified Ancestors (Aakhu) who ensure that the living practice Ma’at; and let the king come forth from the East and go into the Hall of the 42 Ma’at Deities which is presided over by Osiris (Wasir), Lord of the Two Ma’at Qualities, and let him be vindicated true of voice (maa kheru) by that Tribunal on the Day of his Judgment, to be found pure and at one with Osiris; he will Come In Peace (ii em hetep) and he will join that God at the Head of the Company of the Beloved Ancestors in the Blessed and Beautiful West (Amenti).
(9 modification(s))
Mindsoft DOS
Download MSDOS Shell Console
Get Adobe Reader
A new philosophy program and tool for therapeutic analysis: The Development and Operating Systemtheory (DOS) of Human Mind Software (Mindsoft) provides humans with a graphical and textual protocol for self-control programming and monitoring (CP\M). CP\M is a natural language code used to process information, apply knowledge, execute commands, and diagnose cognitive behavior.
DOS is the pinnacle of Information Systems by NewSyllabus.org
Researches toward the application of human-readable code to the development of self control and executive command functions in human beings; to derive, from the sum of historical research methodologies and findings, main algorithms and functions that drive cognitive behavior in human beings.
Current thinking about computers and their impact on society has a been shaped by a rationalistic * tradition that needs to be reexamined and challenged as a source of understanding.
As a first step we will characterize the tradition of rationalism and logical empiricism that can be traced back to at least Plato.
This tradition has been the mainspring of Western science and technology, and has demonstrated its effect most clearly in the ‘hard sciences’ — those that explain the operation of deterministic ** mechanisms whose principles can be captured in formal systems.
The tradition finds its highest expression in mathematics and logic, and has greatly influenced the development of linguistics and cognitive psychology.
We will make no attempt to provide a full historical account of this tradition, or to situate it on some kind of intellectual map. Instead, we have chosen to concentrate on understanding its effects on current discourse and practice, especially in relation to the development and impact of computers. The purpose of this chapter is to outline its major points and illustrate their embodiment in current theories of language, mind, and action.
* Rationalism is defined as a methodology or a theory “in which the criterion of the truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive {meaning the process of reasoning from one or more statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion}”. On the other hand, empiricism is a theory that states that knowledge comes only or primarily from sensory experience. Empiricism in the philosophy of science emphasises evidence, especially as discovered in experiments. It is a fundamental part of the scientific method that all hypotheses and theories must be tested against observations of the natural world rather than resting solely on a priori reasoning, intuition, or revelation. (Wiki)
** Determinism: relating to the philosophical doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes regarded as external to the will. A deterministic system is a system in which no randomness is involved in the development of future states of the system. A deterministic model will thus always produce the same output from a given starting condition or initial state.(Wiki)
(Winograd, Terry. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Chapter 2: The Rationalistic Tradition. Ablex Publishing. 1990. Page 14.)
There is a long history within philosophy of viewing mental and physical descriptions as applying in incommensurate domains. [In other words, mental and physical activities constitute two mutually exclusive categories.]
In approaches based on this “dualism” it is taken for granted that mental predictions (such as “X knows … Y” or “X perceives … Y”) are not expressible in terms of physical descriptions of a nervous system.
Having made this assumption, it becomes a confusion of levels to ask whether a particular activity of the nervous system is a “perception” or whether a certain state is one in which the organism ‘knows’ some ‘fact.’
Among the scientists who work in areas such as neurophysiology and artificial intelligence, however, it is a strongly held working hypothesis that there is a systematic and recurrent relationship between the two domains [of the mental and physical].
It is assumed that: “X sees a red spot” can be correlated with a particular pattern of activity in the retina and visual cortex, or that:
“John believes that Brutus killed Caesar” can be associated with a particular pattern of data in John’s brain, viewed as a computer with appropriate software and storage devices.
Few researchers adopt the naive approach of looking for immediate correlations between the mental and the physical except in peripheral functions like the image manipulation done by the retina.
Usually the argument is based on an analogy to computer programs, in which the organization of the software provides a level of ‘functional description’ that is abstracted away from the specifics of the physical implementation.
An entity counts as being explained [or ‘known’ or perceived’] when its behavior can be described in terms of a compositional analysis that postulates parts that are functionally identified—that play functionally defined roles in its operation.
(Winograd, Terry. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Chapter 4: Cognition as a Biological Phenomenon. Ablex Publishing. 1990. Pages 38-39.)
(last modified 23 June 2020)
Mindsoft as a Service (MaaS)
Mindsoft Command Prompt (click above)
NS:\Mindsoftware_as_a_Service(MaaS)
Course Syllabus (Runtime Environment)
(last modified 3 Mar. 20)
Mindsoft
CAM Memorandum No. 1 (“Resolution”)
Preamble
I, Ombudsman Antarah A. Crawley, in Order to form a Labor Union, establish peace and nobility, provide for the collective consciousness, promote the ancient mysteries, and secure equitable representation for ourselves and our polity, do ordain and establish this Constitution of the College of Ancient Mystery School of Thought.
Article 1
Section 1
Our College is a model society founded upon the rights of light, liberty, and the pursuit of self education (mastery), for that is the highest labor of humanity and the pillar of civilization.
Section 2
Our model school system has three branches of service, each of which offers its body-politic of students and clients the lines of service required to enter, pass, and raise them to the grade of Sui Jure Magister (Self Law Master, aka, Higher Self Education). Our system is the dialectic synthesis of the ancient and modern university systems.
Article 2
Section 1
Branch 1: General Educational Assembly
The Djedi Knights’ College of Ancient Mystery (“Knights’ College”) is an open and free college held in regular session wherein all who seek the truth may come and find it. There is neither division of disciplines, nor enrollment, nor grading in the General Educational Assembly, and the lessons will be taught predominantly through the Dialectic Method using the scientific notation and language of Medu Nedjer. The Knights’ College shall function as the general assembly of students of the Djedi arts and sciences (“the Arcanum,” “the Mysteries”).
Students of the General Assembly are to be instructed in Dialectic Thought and True Speech, aka, the Maa’kheru Knighthood of Djedu, that they may appeal themself to the bar of Ombudsman to be entered as a Knight-elect and be found Maa’kheru (True-of-Voice) before Tribunal.
Section 2
Branch 2: Appellate Tribunal
The disciplined pursuit of knowledge may inspire the student to appeal to the higher faculties of the school system for conference of degrees, wherefore the Office of Ombudsman is hereby charged to serve as the appellate tribunal of the Djedi Knights-elect, wherein those students who elect to the degree of Knighthood may be duly tried, and contested matters of fact and truth may be appealed to the judgment of a discerning, just, and equitable consciousness.
This branch of service includes Audit, Assessment, Assurance, and Adjudgment of persons’ knowledge and intelligence. To this end, the prime directive of the Office of Ombudsman is to determine the truth of the speech and thought of a knight-elect of Djedu.
The conference of Knighthood upon being found Maa’kheru (True-of-Voice) by Tribunal is equivalent to the degree of Sui Jure Magister.
Section 3
Branch 3: Higher Faculty
The Faculty Members of Knights’ College are called Seshu Djehudi Xristiyaan Maliki Tzaddiq as-Salaam, whose name means “the Pious and Learned Scribes of Wusiris Christ, the Righteous, King of Peace,” also called “College of Scribes,” or, “King’s College”. All faculty of the Knights’ College must be members of the King’s College, but the Maa’kheru Djedi Knight need not be a member of the King’s College.
Admission to the College of Scribes is equivalent to the degree of Sui Juris Doctorate, and shall require the Scribe-elect to scribe a synthesis of the law and policy of the Mysteries for implementation in the Knights’ Curriculum, which synthesis must be argued, heard, and found Ma’at before the Djadjat em Djedu.
Section 4
The Djadjat (meaning “the Supreme Court”) shall refer to both the 2nd and 3rd branches of educational service, wherein the Ombudsman shall serve as the chair and chief representative between the higher and lower colleges (and may in fact be the sole faculty member of the College).
Section 5
Jurisdiction and Authority
Knights College shall be ruled by the book N.S.C. and the Office of Ombudsman shall be ruled by the book O.M.; while the King’s College is ruled by the Xristiyaan Consciousness.
Article 3
“Thought precedes matter-reality”: An applied methodology for human being.
“Wusiris is our noble and civil society, who was martyred Before the Common Era; who will be resurrected in our Order of Djedu. Djehudi has risen up the Djed of Wusiris, King of the Knights-defenders of the right. In We, the body politic of our Ancient Ancestors shall be reborn.”
Geometry is the pure form of thought, laying plain all numerical constants with irreducible proof and harmonic beauty; whereas the study of matter-reality is pervaded by spacetime dynamics; movement; function; change.
Article 4
Section 1
Knights’ Creed (Catechism of the Greater Mystery of the Raising Up of the Djed on the Day of Judgment and the Lesser Mystery of the Contention of Suthek and Heru, or, the Greater Mystery of Thought and the Lesser Mystery of the Body Politic)
Ink Djedi Wusir*, Kham Ur Neb Djedu, Khenti Amentiu**, em Karast Maa’kheru***, who is raised up by Djehudi, who is reborn in Waset, who contended against Suthek and was dismembered in Maa’fa****; whose body will be remembered in Heru Wedja Medu*****. Dua****** to Waset, this Holy Church, our Mother, and the Maa’kheru Knighthood of Djedu, and the deliverance from Isfet*******, em peret em Heru********, and everlasting life. Amenta.
* I am the Djed of Osiris
** Great Kham, Lord of Djedu, Foremost Chief of the Westerners
*** Anointed with consciousness, true of voice
**** The Great Disorder
***** On the Day of Judgment
****** Glory be; Adorations
******* Ignorance and Disorder
******** resurrection of the consciousness
Section 2
“Tua Ra”
Ham Dua Ra Iah Illaha Ill Aahla.
Ham Dua Iah Shu Weha Ill Aahla, Amenta.
Section 3
“Ptah Netjer”
Ptah Netjer em Pet Ta, May we have true knowledge of our body in Wusir, our blood in Waset, our conscious in Heru, and deliverance from the ignorance of Isfet. Aahla Amenta.
Article 5
On Historical Dialectical Materialist Thought
Said Friedrich Engels (in The Dialectic of Nature), The reciprocal law of motion, gaining force in proportion to the square of the distance in time from its point of departure (or last measurement), is as true for the highest product of organic matter, thought, as it is for substantial materiality (“matter-reality”). This is at once the thesis of historical and dialectical materialism as for the ancient and mystic orders of the indigenies of the east, west, north and south where it was known as “Ma’at”. Wherefore let the ancient mystery school of thought be reestablished as the synthesis of the historical dialectic of materialist thought from predynastic kemet through the post modernity of western civilization. Whereas the post renaissance West was content to reinvent the wheel of the knowledge of materialist dynamics through the increasingly compartmentalized lenses of the disciplines, we need look no further than the unified civil administration of “Smai-tawi” (“the unification of opposing forces”) among the Khemite-Kushite Diaspora in Afuraka, Asiah, and the Amerikas.
In Dialectic of Nature, Engels postulates a general theory of dialectics to be developed as the science of juxtaposition (“interconnections”), like unto Kant’s earlier Allgemeine Naturgesehichte und Theorie des Himmels and Von Bertalanffy’s later Allgemeine Systemtheorie. Said he, “It is from the history of nature and human society that the laws of dialectics are abstracted; for they are nothing but the most general laws of these two aspects of historical development, as well as of thought itself; and indeed they can be reduced to in the main to three:
“1. The law of the transformation of quantity into quality and vice versa;
“2. The law of the unity of opposing forces;
“3. The law of the negation of the negation.”
In conclusion, these three pillars of thought form the foundation of the Order on which is built the Temple of the Body, the Lodge of the Nous and Spiritus.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that there is ordained and established this 1st day of May, 2019, by the Ombudsman Antarah A. Crawley of the Noble and Holy Order of the Knights of Djedu a College of the Ancient Mystery School of Thought. Aahla Amenta.+
[bulla] Sui Juris Practice
There is established this 27th Day of September, 2018, a firm and perpetual Company of Antarah A. Crawley In His Own Right Practice of Notary Scribe of the New Syllabus of America, pursuant to the Articles of Organization filed to the public space at https://newsyllabus.org/legal on 27 September, 2018. Henceforth all inquiries into the New Syllabus of America shall be made pursuant to the terms and conditions enumerated therein; and such Articles shall supersede all other articles of organization heretofore established. Now Know You that such Practice is hereby offered to the general public in all matters pertaining to the following:
DataHorse 