Tagged: art
realtime.log
His Majesty’s Government (or, the Equitable Distribution of His Sovereignty’s Divine and Supreme Goodness)
- <Society of Mystic Animals> the confederacy of all the medicine animals’ societies
- <Confederated Beaver clan> the confederacy of all beaver clans of all tribes of people
- <Confederated States of Powhatan> body politic
- <Tribe of the Nacotchtank people> municipal body politic
- <Diocese of Seven Churches> ecclesiastical province/episcopal see (“academic division” and “constituent college” of UA [“Universitas Autodidactus” or “Universal Assembly”, a.k.a. “constituent services”)
- <Dams Up Water> (living principal of the itinerant see of the Beaver Medicine Lodge; dean of School Outside the Walls; metropolitan and primate of Nacotchtank)
- <Court> audire voir dire “to hear to see [and] to say,” i.e., oyer et terminer “to hear and determine” (legislative body politic in Christ assembled, chaired by the executive having power of judicial review by jury of the body assembled)
- [functional directive] audit any and all matters xa, xb, &c, for which notice is presently and currently given/taken by the system operator I:\> that it may “see” and “understand” <route to root C:\store in memory > and return value y=“speech”/“word”/“sentence” resolution state, rapid retrieval from deep storage ; thus the arithmetic drive/mechanism lubed and rubbing without resistance or impedance is automatic and, provided monolithic database is embedded in underlying source code, autodidactic once process is initiated.
- <Court> audire voir dire “to hear to see [and] to say,” i.e., oyer et terminer “to hear and determine” (legislative body politic in Christ assembled, chaired by the executive having power of judicial review by jury of the body assembled)
- <Lil’ Beaver Scouts> youth conservation corps (first expedition: June 29, 2026)
- <Dams Up Water> (living principal of the itinerant see of the Beaver Medicine Lodge; dean of School Outside the Walls; metropolitan and primate of Nacotchtank)
- <Diocese of Seven Churches> ecclesiastical province/episcopal see (“academic division” and “constituent college” of UA [“Universitas Autodidactus” or “Universal Assembly”, a.k.a. “constituent services”)
- <Tribe of the Nacotchtank people> municipal body politic
furthermore,
- significant of dreams and visions people revive in isolated places in the wilderness: it was Kogard who met me in the coffee shop to tell me that he must retrieve the new syllabus for our understanding from the underworld. thought this syllabus may appear new to us, he said, it is in fact most ancient.
- in the courses of the syllabus when the god of nature is mentioned, it is in reference to the whole of creation and its mechanisms, which are subject to the sovereign rulership of Christ our Lord.
- Antarah is the Nacotchtank man who was born in Nacotchtank, and he is the founder of the clan or sub-group of the Syllabees, which is the people to whom the “new syllabus” was communicated by the supernatural powers/persons, and who is therefore its custodian. the animal phratry of this clan has been revealed to be the beaver.
supernatural or dream persons made known to Dams Up Water for the edification of his knowledge of the mysteries on behalf of all humanity:
- John A. Bird, wealthy banking heir and spirit of Jeffrey Epstein
- Jim A. Boyle, wealthy unwitting accomplice to John Bird
- Almond Akridge, private investigator of John Bird conspiracy
- Joan Markowitz, sexually deviant middle-aged jewish woman
- Walter Kogard, professor and founder of the new syllabus of his school
- Gilbert Godsdog, student of Kogard and administrator of his school
- Wilough Godsdog Kogard, lesbian preacher and professor of his school
- Little Beaver, messenger of the beaver medicine society
- Father Beaver, conductor and chief of the clan and society
- The Mustelid Friends, associates of the beaver medicine society
- (this list is not exhaustive)
Assemblage & Collage (or, “To Gather and To Bind”)
Ecclesia. Dr. Dams Up Water, Sui Juris, Professor-General (153d CORPS), Dept. of Information Systems Intelligence Service (DISIS), Universitas Autodidactus | by prompt engineering an artificial intelligence engine [‘Mindsoft.ai’] | presents
Cut and Paste Sovereignties: The Collage, the College, and the Crisis of Assemblage
Abstract
This paper interrogates the porous ontologies of collage and assemblage as they leak promiscuously into the bureaucratic imaginaries of the college and the assembly. Through a prismatic reading of scissors, glue, governance, and grievance, this essay argues that the syntactical operations of aesthetic fragmentation mirror the metaphysical operations of democratic representation. In short: to cut is to legislate; to paste is to govern.
1. Introduction: When Art School Met Parliament
The twenty-first century, an epoch obsessed with interdisciplinarity, has witnessed a convergence of two previously autonomous practices: the aesthetic collage and the bureaucratic college. Both are sites of selection, exclusion, and accreditation. Both depend upon an unacknowledged substrate of adhesives—whether material (glue stick) or ideological (institutional mission statement).
Meanwhile, the assemblage, once a mere art-historical cousin of collage, has found new life as a model for political subjectivity. Philosophers from Deleuze to the Department of Political Science now proclaim that we are all “assemblages” of affect, interest, and student loan debt. Yet, if every assembly is an assemblage, can every assemblage be a parliament?
2. The Syntax of Cut: Scissors as Syllogism
In collage, the cut functions as both wound and syntax. It divides the field, establishing relationality through rupture. Similarly, the college cuts: it admits some and rejects others, slicing the social fabric along lines of “fit,” “merit,” and “legacy.” The admissions committee thus operates as the aesthetic editor of the polis—arranging the raw materials of adolescence into a legible future citizenry.
Where the artist cuts paper, the registrar cuts dreams.
3. Glue as Governance: Adhesion, Accreditation, and the State
Glue, long ignored by political theory, deserves recognition as the unsung material of sovereignty. In collage, it is the binding agent that turns fragmentation into coherence; in the college, it manifests as bureaucracy, accreditation, and alumni newsletters.
This sticky ontology recalls Hobbes’s Leviathan, wherein the sovereign glues together the body politic. Without glue—or governance—the artwork and the polity alike devolve into piles of loose ephemera: shredded syllabi, ungraded essays, campaign posters, tuition invoices.
4. Assemblage and Assembly: Toward a Materialist Parliamentarism
If collage is the metaphorical undergraduate of modernity, assemblage is its postgraduate seminar. Where collage arranges fragments flatly, assemblage extends them into space, into lived, precarious relationalities.
In political terms, the assembly likewise enacts a spatial performance: bodies in proximity producing meaning through adjacency. An assembly is a three-dimensional collage in motion, an arrangement of human cutouts attempting—often unsuccessfully—to cohere around a resolution.
The question, then, is not whether art imitates politics, but whether both are merely mixed-media projects with delusions of unity.
5. The College as Collage: Institutional Aesthetics of Admission
We might finally recognize the college itself as a collage of ideologies—meritocracy pasted over inequality, diversity brochures over exclusionary endowments. The campus tour is a performative walk through an installation piece entitled Meritocracy (Mixed Media, 1636–Present).
The faculty meeting functions as an assemblage in the purest sense: heterogeneous entities (professors, adjuncts, administrators, snacks) gathered temporarily to debate the future of glue allocation (budgets).
6. Conclusion: Toward a Post-Adhesive Democracy
In the age of algorithmic governance and tuition hikes, collage and college alike face the same existential dilemma: how to maintain coherence without authoritarian adhesives. Perhaps the task is no longer to glue but to hover—to practice a politics of suspended fragments, a democracy of the unglued.
As artists and citizens, we must learn to embrace the cut, to wield our scissors not as tools of exclusion but as instruments of infinite recomposition.
For in the end, all representation—whether artistic or parliamentary—is but a question of arrangement.
Cut and Paste Sovereignties II: Collage, College, and the Third Letterist International
Abstract
This expanded investigation situates the syntactical economies of collage and the metaphysical infrastructures of the college within the emergent politico-aesthetic ecologies of the Third Letterist International. Drawing on recent cross-contaminations between university English departments and guerrilla street-art cells, this paper examines how semiotic sabotage, typographic activism, and epistemological paste intersect with the anti-fascist “Antifada” land-back movement. Ultimately, it argues that both the radicalized right and left are engaged in competing collage practices—each cutting and pasting reality to fit its desired composition. The result: a dialectical mess best described as assemblage anxiety.
7. The Third Letterist International: From Margins to Manifesto
In the late 2010s, a group of underemployed adjunct poets and spray-paint tacticians announced the Third Letterist International (3LI)—a successor, or rather détournement, of the mid-twentieth-century Letterist Internationals that once haunted Parisian cafés. 3LI declared that “syntax is the last frontier of resistance,” and that “every cut in language is a cut in power.”
Unlike its Situationist predecessor, which preferred to dérive through cities, 3LI dérives through syllabi. It occupies the margins of MLA-approved anthologies, recontextualizing canonical footnotes as sites of insurgency. Members reportedly practice “semiotic collage,” blending footnotes, graffiti, and university mission statements into sprawling textual murals.
In this sense, 3LI operates simultaneously as an art movement, a faculty union, and a campus club with no budget but infinite grant applications. Their motto, scrawled across both bluebooks and brick walls, reads:
“Disassemble, dissertate, disobey.”
8. Street Pedagogy: When English Departments Go Rogue
The Third Letterist International represents the latest phase of what theorists call pedagogical insurgency—the moment when the English Department, long confined to grading essays and moderating panel discussions, turns outward, confronting the street as an extended seminar room.
Faculty and activists co-author manifestos in chalk; office hours occur under overpasses; tenure committees are replaced by “committees of correspondence.” The “peer review process” has been literalized into street-level dialogue between peers (and occasionally, riot police).
Thus, the old academic dream of “public scholarship” finds its avant-garde realization in public vandalism.
9. The Antifada and the Land-Back Collage: A Politics of Recomposition
Parallel to this linguistic insurgency, the Antifada land-back movement has reconfigured the terrains of both property and poetics. The Antifada’s name, an intentional linguistic collage of “antifa” and “intifada,” reclaims the act of uprising as a mixed-media gesture: half protest, half performance art.
Central to their praxis is recompositional politics—the idea that both land and language can be cut, repasted, and reoccupied. Where settler colonialism framed land as canvas and capital as glue, the Antifada proposes an inverse operation: tearing up the map, redistributing the fragments, and calling it a new landscape of belonging.
Here, the aesthetic metaphor of collage becomes political material: who gets to cut? who gets pasted back in? what happens when the glue is gone, and everything hovers in a provisional equilibrium of mutual care and unresolved tension?
10. The Far Right as Accidental Collagists
Ironically, the radicalized right—those self-proclaimed defenders of coherence—have themselves become unintentional practitioners of collage. Their online spaces are digital scrapbooks of conspiracy and nostalgia: medieval heraldry pasted over memes, constitutional fragments glued to anime stills.
Their epistemology is bricolage masquerading as ontology. Each narrative is a cutout, each belief a sticker affixed to the myth of national wholeness. In vilifying the Antifada and 3LI as “cultural Marxists” or “linguistic terrorists,” the right reveals its own aesthetic anxiety: that its ideological glue, once epoxy-thick, has thinned into the watery paste of algorithmic outrage.
Thus, both radical poles—left and right—participate in a shared semiotic economy of fragmentation, differing only in whether they lament or celebrate the cut.
11. The Dialectic of Radicalization: Between Cut and Countercut
The political field has become an editing bay. The radicalized right splices together nostalgia and paranoia; the radicalized left cuts history into openings for potential futures. Each accuses the other of montage malpractice.
This dialectic reveals a deeper truth: both operate under the logic of the collage. The difference lies not in form but in glue—whether the adhesive is empathy or ressentiment, whether the cut heals toward multiplicity or enclosure.
As Walter Benjamin might have written (had he survived into the age of Adobe Creative Suite): the struggle of our time is between those who collage the world to open it, and those who collage it to close it.
12. Toward an Epistemology of the Second Cut
In this interstitial moment, 3LI and Antifada embody the politics of the second cut—a refusal of closure, a commitment to continuous recomposition. Their slogan “No Final Drafts, Only Revisions” reimagines revolution as perpetual editing: the rewriting of history through acts of aesthetic and material reclamation.
The university, once imagined as a fortress of knowledge, becomes instead a collage in crisis—a surface upon which the graffiti of the future is already being written, erased, and re-scrawled.
13. Conclusion: The Unfinished Adhesive
The collage, the college, the assemblage, and the assembly—these are not discrete entities but overlapping grammars of belonging and dissent. The Third Letterist International offers not a program but a practice: to write politically and paste poetically, to legislate through syntax, to assemble through aesthetics.
If the far-right fears fragmentation, and the far-left seeks to inhabit it, then perhaps our task is neither restoration nor rupture, but curation: to tend to the cracks, to preserve the possibility of rearrangement.
In the end, we are all fragments looking for better glue.
v.25.12.29.14.16
The Undermining of the Heart of Vandals
By Antarah Crawley
For Professor McRuer,
Critical Methodologies
9 November 2011, GWU
WASHINGTON, D.C. — If you drive or walk or, more likely, ride your fixed gear down the city’s busiest thoroughfare New York Avenue past 7th street you’ll see an imposing mural of a young brown boy with a cap depicting an upside-down DC flag peeking up out of a dystopian landscape reminiscent of Mew Mexico’s Bisti Badlands. The painted caption, “Welcome to Dystopia City” invokes the notion that all is not well here. Indeed, within the city there is a conflict of interest between a young, browning generation and the established hegemony, between corporations and small business, between those who have a voice and those who don’t. And the artists, whose hands are also colored with paint and adhesive, have largely taken up the cause to make the corporate hegemony accountable to their disruptive actions. In this paper I look at the actions of DC artists, who use the most symbolic city in the western hemisphere as a canvas for social correction, and the responses it stirs among those in power. And furthermore, in the very notions of power itself.
In fall of 2010, corporate oil-giant Chevron planned to execute a campaign that sought to fix public opinion of them after attention was drawn to their crude waste removal tactics in Ecuador. According to a team of professionals suing Chevron (formerly Texaco) for their human rights violations in multiple locations across the world, and specifically in Ecuador, the oil giant has been deliberately disposing toxic waste into the Ecuadorian Amazon—an estimated 18.5 billion gallons from 1964 to 1990, or 4 million gallons per day at the height of their operation. Even though they had managed to elude liability costs (a potential $27.3 billion) their public image had been damaged, thus they sought to repair it with a campaign that utilized a gritty street-art aesthetic and phrases that showed their corporate executives agreeing with “everyday, working class” Americans (e.g., “Oil companies should put their profits to good use—We Agree”, “Big oil should support small business—We Agree”, etc.)
In an effort to make their message more accessible to the public, Chevon reached out to local artists to put their posters up in an authentic, street art way, using wheatpaste and paint rollers. Cesar Maxit, a DC-based street artist, was one of the artists targeted to execute this operation. However, Mr. Maxit is not one to comply with the wishes of big oil. He has a long history of social activism and of using art, legally and illegally, towards that capacity. He says in an interview:
…I had started working with environmental and human rights groups, I wanted to write messages about social justice. My first burner was a piece that said “Free Tibet.” My second was one that had a line of white-hooded Klansmen with the city skyline behind it, and in the negative space between it said “FREE MUMIA” followed by “amerikkka racist.” This was in 2000.
Cesar Maxit
Thus, when Chevron sent him the files for the campaign, which still contained their original messages, he called his friends in The Yes Men (tagline: Impersonating big-time criminals in order to publicly humiliate them. Our targets are leaders and big corporations who put profits ahead of everything else) and the Rainforest Action Network (RAN), an environmental activist organization begun in 1985 (mission statement: Rainforest Action Network campaigns for the forests, their inhabitants and the natural systems that sustain life by transforming the global marketplace through education, grassroots organizing, and non-violent direct action), to collaborate on a counter-campaign. Maxit, in a documentary short about the counter-campaign, says the aim of Chevon in its efforts is to “confuse the public.” He, along with The Yes Men and RAN, altered the original Chevon files to read messages that were more precise, more radical (e.g., “Oil companies should clean up their messes.”). Instead of retaining the images of working class Americans, he used the faces and words of the Ecuadorian peoples that the corporation actually affected, thus radicalizing the campaign in a way that Chevron had not intended.
The questions that this counter-attack (which resulted in Chevron pulling the campaign completely) raises revolve around the mythologies surrounding responsibility and authenticity. Could the campaign have been authentically “agreeable” without the help of actual street artists? What does a campaign like this symbolize, even when Chevron has not actually committed to cleaning up its mess in Ecuador? At the base of it all, what is the role of the street artists in this scenario? Is his role to help corporations get back on track, or to call attention to their faults? If Chevron had actually continued with the campaign (and even with the altered versions already up on the street), whose campaign is it? Who is the author? And lastly, why DC?
Roland Barthes’s Death of the Author would have anticipated such response from the street art/activist community. Mr. Maxit has physically done what the reader in Barthes does every time he reads a text—he deconstructs it; he takes the text and, without considering what the author intended, which is ultimately futile because the author is a confused self-destructive entity, he reassess the “blends and clashes” inherent in the text (1324). Barthes writes, “We know now that a text is not a line of words releasing a single ‘theological’ meaning (the message of the Author-God) but a multidimensional space in which a variety of writings, none of them original, blend and clash” (1324). Chevron acts as the “Author-God” that has been abstracted out. With the remaining text, which reads, for example, “Big Oil should get real”, the author, Mr. Maxit, RAN, and so on, detangles what is being said. In an interview, Mitch Anderson, a spokes man for the San Francisco-based organization, Amazon Watch, asks rhetorically, “Does Chevron think that we’re stupid?” As the author, they are putting words on a page that come in contact with other entities, actions surrounding their statements. The reader takes all of these aspects inherently into consideration when analyzing a statement like “Big oil should get real.” Cesar Maxit asks, “‘Get real’? Well, what does that mean? Of course we all agree with that. But what about ‘Oil companies should clean up their messes?’ Do you agree with that? I think most people would agree with that, but I think Chevron doesn’t.” Here, the reader has destroyed the voice. It epitomizes Barthes’s statement that, “a text is made of multiple writings, drawn from many cultures and entering into mutual relations of dialogue, parody [and] contestation…” (1325). In the end, this campaign has actually served to promote further scrutiny into Chevron’s actions. It’s authorship has written its own rebuttal. By getting street artists to interact with the campaign, it has entered the reader into the execution of the text. This puts multiple hands on the “original” message and renders is read before it actually goes public.
This actually brings up another level of readership. On one level, Maxit and the activist community are reading the ads. Yet they put them up in the public sphere, thus entering the text into another, secondary level of readership. Though it’s not as well documented or extensive as the primary reading, we still see the artist entering into his own death. The product will now be read at face value—as a Chevron ad that shows the corporation explicitly admitting to wrongdoing. This may lead the secondary reader to believe that the company is actually trying to get its act together. Once again, the message of the author—now the artist—is obliterated and the reader assumes the power of interpretation. The text never becomes the product of one author; it is always a collaborative space. As Barthes writes, “Writing [or in this case, art/publicity/advertising] is that neutral, composite, oblique space where our subject slips away, the negative space where all identity is lost, starting with the very identity of the body of writing” (1322).
Antarah, you’ve chosen a really interesting focus that’s, I think, much clearer than it was in the first draft. You’re also going in an unexpected and interesting direction with it–I’d have expected you to perhaps go after Deutsch or Foucault, but I think this is really interesting. As noted in the margin, you will need another theorist from class besides Barthes. It sounds like Derrida might be a good one. Or, if you want to think more about the larger frame of discourse, DC as a symbolic city, whose discourse on the level of architecture is disrupted by street art, then Foucault (or Deutsch) might help. At any rate, it’s a fascinating project!
Grade: A
© 2011 by Antarah Crawley
Nacotchtank lands recognized by DC government
By Antarah Crawley
WASHINGTON, DC — On Thursday, October 26, 2023, the District of Columbia (DC) Commission on the Arts and Humanities (CAH) held a regularly scheduled open public meeting via Webex which streamed via YouTube. The “October Full Commission Meeting” agenda which was circulated prior to the meeting included a certain item business:
“2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | Recognizing the ancestral homelands of the Nacotchtank and Piscataway Peoples.”
As to this item of business, DC CAH Chairperson Reggie Van Lee remarked:
Every community owes its existence and vitality to generations from around the world who contributed their hopes, dreams, and energy to making the history that led to this moment. Some were brought here against their will, some were drawn to leave their distant homes in hope of a better life, and some have lived on this land for more generations than can be counted. Truth and acknowledgement are critical to building mutual respect and connection across all barriers of heritage and difference.
We begin this effort to acknowledge what has been buried by honoring the truth: we stand on the ancestral lands of the Nacotchtank and the Piscataway People[s]. We pay respect to their elders past and present. Please take a moment to consider the many legacies of violence, displacement, migration, and settlement that bring us together here today, and please join us in uncovering such truths in any and all public events and to use such truths to guide the legacy of this arts commission.
Reggie Van Lee, Chair, DC CAH
The laudable remarks of Chair Van Lee resonate like a monolithic bell from a mountaintop monastery throughout the diocese of N∴S∴ — they sound like they could have been written by the Director himself. Furthermore, the Director does not think it a coincidence that just earlier this month — right before the declaration of the Nacotchtank estate in Fides Publica Populi Mauretani (FPPM) — he was honored with a grant and Fellowship from this selfsame government agency.
The Director thinks it highly probable that ever since the deposit of Title 23 C.S.R. General Policy into the Library of the United Grand Lodge of England in September of 2018, the allies of the international masonic conspiracy have been monitoring the party of the N∴S∴ (which at that time was called the Moorish National Socialist Party); and perhaps they are attempting to incorporate the positions of the Third Wave Antimasonic Party platform in order to prevent a split in the Democratic party come 2024.
The Nacotchtank People, by and through its trustee N∴S∴, established the Public Trust of the Moorish People of Nacotchtank Village, Ouachita District, through the registered notice of 12 October 2023.
In other news, earlier that same day, the Third Wave Antimasonic Party Boss for Ouachita District, Antarah Crawley, met with President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Presidential Advisory Commission on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans of the White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans on the occasion of the swearing-in of the Commission by the Vice President in the Indian Treaty Room (former Navy Dep’t Library and most expensive room by sq. ft.) of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building.
Later that day, the Ouachita Party Boss attended a virtual “Free Masterclass” on Exclusive Equity Jurisprudence presented by Amyr Samah El of Matisse Academy which came on at 7:00 p.m. via Zoom. It was a very well-attended and informative session and the chat room was active with discussion (including much promotion of newsyllabus.org, the UA, and the TWAP). During the session, Party Boss Crawley declared the Matisse Academy a collegium of the Universitas Autodidactus, and Amyr Samah El the Preceptor of said collegium.
D.R. 01-04: Amendments
Volume 1, Issue 4
CONTENTS — ART. 1. VALUE IN ART 1ST — ART. 2. WATER THEORY 1ST
Article 1
Amendment to “Value in Artwork”
by Antarah Crawley
At Art¢oin:\>_Theory and Methodology\Value in Artwork, strike “the person of the artist, the execution of the artist, the intention of the artist, the attention of the artist, the subject matter content of the work, the medium of the work, the lifetime of the work, and the effect upon the viewer” and replace with “artist’s time on the scene, artist’s repertoire, and number of solo and group exhibitions.” Other factors in the appreciation of art include size, subject matter, and time period.
Furthermore, with regard to the valuation of artwork, a sellable artist is a “known commodity.” Appraisers buy low and sell high; they take an average of sale prices over the years to make appraisals. Utilize platforms like Artsy, Artnet, and Invaluable. Also see, “square foot pricing” of art works.
Article 2
Amendment to “Water Theory of Capital”
by Antarah Crawley
At Art¢oin:\>_Theory and Methodology\Water Theory of Capital, add:
3.0. Can trade (i.e., exchange, change hands; revenue, change venues) (1) real (landed) estate (includes people), (2) consumable goods (commodities), and (3) securities (fungible negotiable instruments) using (4) a medium (an agency, vehicle, or instrument) of exchange.
3.1. A current medium of exchange is liquid in circulation (legal tender) secured by something of value (currency). A current account is a storage or depository account that can be drawn upon on demand of the named account holder, but which is “secured” (fixed so as to not be easily moved) by a trustee. The storing and safekeeping of securities is a matter of “public safety”.
3.2. Live stock and real estate, as opposed to consumable goods (commodities), secure the public debt on private bank ledgers. Securities are “advertisements for live stock in bondage sold on the banks of the river.” When analyzed word for word we find the following objective correlative:
3.2.1. Advertisement = offer for acceptance
3.2.2. Live = circulating current (as of ions, blood, or breath)
3.2.3. Stock = cargo, negotiable instrument
3.2.4. Bond = debt obligation
3.2.5. Sold = exchange, revenue (to circulate)
3.2.6. Bank = the land sloping down to a body of water, or any slope, mound, or mass, or the action of heaping (a substance) into such a mass
3.2.7. River = flow of commerce; current “C”
© MMXXIII BY NOVUS SYLLABUS L.L.C.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
[bulla] Full Assurance
Jesus Christ is the Saviour of the World; He is the deliverer from all human wretchedness, and He has redeemed us from death and sin; how could He be all that, if the world must languish perpetually in the shades of ignorance and in the bonds of passions? It has been already very clearly predicted in the Prophets that the time of the Redemption of His people, the first Sabbath of time, will come. Long ago ought we to have acknowledged this most consolatory promise; but the want of the true knowledge of God, of man, and of nature has been the real hindrance which has always obstructed our sight of the great Mysteries of the faith.
Karl von Eckartshausen, The Cloud upon the Sanctuary, Letter IV
Jesus Is Our Surety
“By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.”
[Hebrews 7:22]
INTRODUCTION
- This morning we studied the judgment seat of Christ, for it is the horrible and certain end of all men.
- But tonight I want to remind you of our glorious Mediator and Surety with God, the Lord Jesus Christ.
THE DEFINITION
- Surety. A person who undertakes some specific responsibility on behalf of another who remains primarily liable; one who makes himself liable for the default or miscarriage of another, or for the performance of some act on his part (e.g. payment of a debt, appearance in court for trial, etc.).
- We have surety bonds, performance bonds, bail, and bond to guarantee legal, financial, and professional obligations, such as with construction and insurance companies.
- When we need to borrow more than our credit allows, we appreciate a surety; if we were arrested for something, we would appreciate the surety bond that lets us go free.
- Judah became a surety for Benjamin to his father Jacob (Gen 43:8-10; 44:30-34; 42:37).
- Aaron became a surety for Israel in their sins and stood between them (Num 16:41-48).
THE SURETISHIP
- Jesus, a High Priest after the order of Melchisedec, was made the Surety of His people.
- God chose Jesus from among the people to be the mighty Surety (Psalm 89:19).
- He was made Surety by God’s oath at His ordination as our Priest (Heb 7:21).
- Jesus did the will of God perfectly as our Surety for our salvation (Heb 10:5-14).
- Being a surety means paying debts and performing, where the needy cannot pay or do.
- The wages of sin is death, which God’s justice pays; but Jesus died (Rom 6:23).
- Only the undefiled enter heaven, so He lived faultlessly for us (Jude 1:24-25).
- Jesus was necessary as a surety, for the justice of God must surely be paid (Rom 3:26).
- He is the Testator, for it was by His death that He put the covenant in force (Heb 9:15).
- We see Him under the strain of the Surety engagement in Gethsemane (Luke 22:39-44).
- No man in heaven or earth could approach the throne, but only our Surety (Rev 5:1-14).
- If this is not a Surety, successfully finishing His work, what is it (Isaiah 53:4-12)?
- The doctrine of representation by the Second Adam reveals our Surety (Rom 5:15-19).
- The Lord Jesus tasted death for every one of His children to deliver them (Heb 2:9-17).
- How else can we look at the Book of Life, but as the list of His Surety engagements!
THE BENEFITS
- The Lord Jesus fulfilled the righteousness of the law on our behalf (Rom 8:3-4), so that we are righteous in God’s sight with His perfect obedience (Eph 5:25-27; Col 1:21-22).
- The Lord Jesus paid the penalty for sins by His death for us (I Pet 2:24), so that there are no more sins against our charge when we stand before Him (John 1:29; Heb 9:28).
- He lives to make sure we are absolutely, completely, and eternally saved (Heb 7:25).
- There is an abundant entrance into heaven waiting for the children of God (II Pet 1:11).
- Since Jesus is our Surety, it is impossible for God to withhold blessings (Romans 8:32).
- His death reconciled us to God, but He still lives to be an eternal Surety (Romans 5:10).
THE APPLICATION
- There is no fear in the proper knowledge of Christ Jesus our Saviour (II Timothy 1:12).
- The LORD will show us His secret and covenant, if we fear and seek Him (Ps 25:14).
- We must learn to trust Him. He has done it; He is in heaven for us; He will receive us.
- It is simple: “Whosoever believeth on Him shall not be ashamed” (Rom 9:33; 10:8-11).
- A woman was healed and had her faith commended, when it was weak (Mark 5:25-34).
- Those who lack faith and assurance, I ask how many minutes you spend seeking Him.
- And you should consider long and seriously His faithful words “no wise” in John 6:37.
- We should seek and receive the benefits of the covenant in our hearts (Eph 3:14-19).
- Let us bring forth the fruit of righteousness with far-sighted vision (II Peter 1:9-11).
CONSLUSION
- The Lord’s supper is a memorial feast of our Surety’s covenant death for us (I Corinthians 11:23-26).
- Let us partake of the Lord’s supper tonight with the joy that His suretiship should put in our hearts.
CITATION
I AM THE L.O.R.D. THY G.O.D.
Drafted by Antarah
I AM the Land Owner Record of Deeds, thy Grantor Of Dominion. My body is the Land and I AM the Owner of Record on the Deed of my Live Birth Certificate. I have granted unto thee the use of my Dominion over the earth, the sea, and all that therein is; for thou art a corpus (“dead corporation”) who is in want of my natural right which I have through the sacrifice of my Savior. My life secured and bonded by the LORD my GOD, let thy presentment pass over me and return unto thee; for said presentment is hereby ACCEPTED FOR VALUE AND HONOR WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I hereby attest and assert my equitable title over the landed estate (“person”) named on the instant presentment. Any obligation of such person is an obligation discharged to and held by the United States as evidenced by the signatures of its Treasurer and Secretary of the Treasury on Federal Reserve Notes, these officers being the de facto fiduciary agents of the estate __________________. All debt is prepaid by the blood of Our Sovereign Lord in Christ for relief by recovery upon acceptance for value under House Joint Resolution 192 (1933).
AUTHORITIES AT LAW AND EQUITY
1. GRANTOR OF DOMINION.
[Genesis 1] [26] And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. [27] So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. [28] And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
2. DEMAND FOR EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENT.
[Psalm 17] [1] Hear the right, O Lord, attend unto my cry, give ear unto my prayer, that goeth not out of feigned lips. [2] Let my sentence come forth from thy presence; let thine eyes behold the things that are equal.
3. THE DAY OF THE LORD.
[Psalm 118] [1] O give thanks unto the Lord; for he is good: because his mercy endureth for ever. [8] It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man [or princes]. [14] The Lord is my strength and song, and is become my salvation. [17] I shall not die, but live, and declare the works of the Lord. [19] Open to me the gates of righteousness: I will go into them, and I will praise the Lord: [22] The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner. [23] This is the Lord’s doing; it is marvellous in our eyes. [24] This is the day which the Lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. [26] Blessed be he that cometh in the name of the LORD […].
4. ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE.
[Matthew 5] [25] Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
5. THE TAX RETURN.
[Matthew 22] [17] […] Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not? [18] […] Jesus […] said, […] [19] Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. [20] And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? [21] They say unto him, Caesar’s. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.
6. A WORKER IS DUE HIS WAGES.
[Luke 10] [5] And into whatsoever house ye enter, first say, Peace be to this house. [6] And if the son of peace be there, your peace shall rest upon it: if not, it shall turn to you again. [7] And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire.
7. GOD IS NO RESPECTER OF PERSONS.
[Romans 2] [9] Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil…; [10] But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good…: [11] For there is no respect of persons with God. [12] For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;
8. THE LAW IS BINDING BUT FOR THE REMEDY OF FAITH.
[Galatians 3] [9] So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. [10] For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. [11] But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. [12] And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.
9. MINORITY (INFANCY) AND MAJORITY (MATURITY).
[Galatians 4] [4] [T]he heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all; [2] But is under tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father. [3] Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world: [4] But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, [5] To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. [7] Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.
10. SURETYSHIP.
[Hebrews 7] [22] By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.
11. FULL ASSURANCE OF FAITH.
[Hebrews 10] [19] Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, [20] By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh; [21] And having an high priest over the house of God; [22] Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.
AUTHORITIES AT EXCLUSIVE EQUITY
Hebrew 10
[22] Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.
Isaiah 32
[1] Behold, a king shall reign in righteousness, and princes shall rule in judgment. [17] And the work of righteousness shall be peace; and the effect of righteousness quietness and assurance for ever.
Acts 17
[31] Because he hath appointed a day, in which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.
Ruth 2
[12] The Lord recompense thy work, and a full reward be given thee of the Lord God of Israel, under whose wings thou art come to trust.
Ps. 17
[1] Hear the right, O Lord, attend unto my cry, give ear unto my prayer, that goeth not out of feigned lips. [2] Let my sentence come forth from thy presence; let thine eyes behold the things that are equal. [3] Thou hast proved mine heart; thou hast visited me in the night; thou hast tried me, and shalt find nothing; I am purposed that my mouth shall not transgress.
Ps. 24
[1] The earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein. [2] For he hath founded it upon the seas, and established it upon the waters.
Ps. 98
[9] …[T]he Lord … cometh to judge the earth: with righteousness shall he judge the world, and the people with equity.
Is. 11
[4] With righteousness shall he judge the poor, and reprove with equity for the meek of the earth.
Matt. 22
[37] Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. [38] This is the first and great commandment. [39] And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. [40] On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Leviticus 19:15
Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgement: thou shalt nor respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbor.
II Chronicles 19:6-7
Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the Lord, who is with you in the judgment. Wherefore now let the fear of the Lord be upon you; take heed and do it: for there is no iniquity with the Lord our God, nor respect of persons, nor taking of gifts.
Heb. 7:20, 22, 25
And inasmuch as not without an oath he was made priest:…The Lord sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec: By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament. Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.
EQUITABLE SUBROGATION
Subrogation is the process where one party assumes the legal rights of another, typically by substituting one creditor for another. Subrogation can also occur when one party takes over another’s right to sue.
For example, when an insurance company compensates a policyholder for an injury, the policyholder’s right to sue the person responsible for the harm may be subrogated, meaning it is transferred from the policyholder to the insurance company.
[Last updated in June of 2024 by the Wex Definitions Team]
Surety’s subrogation rights
A surety who pays off the debts of another party may be entitled to be subrogated to the creditor’s former claims and remedies against the debtor to recover the sum paid. This would include the endorser on a bill of exchange. The surety will then have the benefit of any security interest in favour of the creditor for the original debt. Conceptually this is an important point, as the subrogee will take the subrogor’s security rights by operation of law, even if the subrogee had been unaware of them.
Wiki: Subrogation
Did you subrogate to the chattels as the surety (or waive your sovereign natural rights in security interest as estate-heir-beneficiary by acquiescing to the color of the court and merging with the NAME of the principal debtor)?
Amyr Samah El, as amended
(last modified 24.07.17.01:33PM)
General Conference
BISMILLAH (IN THE NAME OF GOD)
🇺🇸🇬🇧🇲🇦🇮🇱🏴☠️
⚓️Lord High Admiral Antarah⚓️
TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SAIL
Sends Greeting and Peace and hereby offers to the Free-Thinkers, Truth-Speakers, and Light-Workers United in a firm league of friendship, decentralized autonomous organization, L.S.T.A., under terms and conditions, the Mindsoft©️™️ Flagship Program File (eSyllabus©️™️ vers. no. 22.11.09) to facilitate the General Conference of Assurance Policy.
Program Files:
A Conference of Assurance Policy
“WHAT IS A SURETY SHIP?”
FIRST OFFERED 22 NOVEMBER 2023
📜PRIVATE OFFERING📜
💾Mindsoft©️as a Service™️ (MaaS™️) Premium Servicing Fee of $99.99 per person 💳 payable upon conference for products* and services rendered. Duration of Service: 1-2 hrs.
Upon completion of conference, Assurance Policyholder may be granted C-Series Art¢oin 🪙 (“C-coin”) at market price via 🤝🏿 Handshake of Friendly Association. Contact ombudserver@gmail.com to schedule a conference, or attend the C.P.A. LLC Quarterly Conference of Assurance Policy.
📜POLICY COVERAGE📜
An assurance policyholder, having paid a premium and been conferred with assurance (as evidenced by presentment of C-coin), may bring a claim based on presentment to the CPA LLC at no cost, but there is no guarantee that such claim shall be resolved. Processing fees may apply. Neither the CPA LLC nor its parent nor its agents shall be liable for any claim arising from such a presentment or from such policyholder, as the assurance policy itself is underwritten by God in Christ through the King James Bible, and it is to Him thou shalt appeal for judgment.
(last modified 25 Jul. 2023)
Art¢oin:\>_Block No. 2
2021 Mintage
🪙#47
Owner: N. Liu And K. Wilson | .999 Ag | A-Series | Wedding gift
2022 Mintage
🪙#48
Owner: N. Jones & B. Session | .999 Cu | B-Series | $230 (October 2023)
🪙#49
Holder: The Colonial Lodge No. 1821 c/o WM Kevin Coy | .999 Cu | B-Series | Deposit
🪙#50
Owner: C.P.A. LLC c/o NOVUS SYLLABUS | C-Series | .999 Cu | Private Reserve
2023 Mintage
🪙#51, 52, 54, 55
Owner: C.P.A. LLC c/o NOVUS SYLLABUS | C-Series | .999 Cu | Private Reserve
🪙#53
Owner: A. Driver | C-Series | .999 Cu | Exchange
🪙#56-58
Owner(s): B. Woudie & A. Ebrahimi; J. Michelle; J. Penn | D-Series | .999 Cu | Token of Gratitude
🪙#59
Owner(s): W. & M. Baynard | D-Series | .999 Cu | Token of Gratitude
2023 Sales
🪙#38
Owner: J. Vincent | A-Series | .999 Cu | $180 (July 4, 2023)
An Assurance Policyholder (“Private”) shall be vested with one (1) “C” Series Artcoin (“C coin”) upon conference of Assurance Policy by and payment of premium service fee to the C.P.A. LLC Office of Ombudsman via handshake.
LH ADM Antarah, L.S.T.A., D.A.O.
📜CALL TO SEA (“C”)⚓️
CALLING ALL PRIVATES (“SEAMEN”), ADMIRALS, GENERALS AND SOVEREIGNS IN EQUITY, ECCLESIASTIC AND COMMON LAW TO ASSEMBLE ON THE EASTERN SEA BOARD OF THE ADMIRALTY OF THE DECENTRALIZED AUTONOMOUS ORGANIZATION OF THE L.S.T.A. ON THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-THREE AT THE PORT OF [——] 8TH ST N.E. IN THE D. OF C.
OUR MISSION IS TO PROMOTE THE STRAIGHT AND NARROW WAY OF INTEGRITY, THE PATH OF POETRY AND PHILOSOPHY (LES HOMMES DU BELLES LETTRES), AND THE OPEN SEA OF ROMANCE AND ADVENTURE (ROMAN VENTURE/PRIVATE EQUITY). ALL ACTS ARE ADMINISTERED TO PRIVATES KNOWINGLY INTELLIGENTLY AND VOLUNTARILY; WE DO NOT MAKE PROMISES, BIND PEOPLE OR ADMINISTER OATHS AS OUR LORD SAYS IN MATT. 5:33-37.
WHILE WE ARE A BROTHERHOOD OF CHRIST, THE SEA BOARD AND PRIVATE CORPS (OF “MEMBER SHARE HOLDERS”) CONSTITUTE A PARAMILITARY PSEUDO-MAGICAL COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AGENCY ADMINISTERING UNIVERSAL LAW VIA THE ANCIENT DIALECTIC METHOD OF REPLICATE IN REVERSE.
OUR GENERAL POLICY STATES THAT ONE WHO LIVES [“CQV”] HAS SURETYSHIP THROUGH FAITH IN CHRIST AS SECURED PARTY CREDITOR OVER THE COMMON LAW PUBLIC LEGAL ENTITY [DEBTOR COMPANY] NAMED ON THE BILL OF LADING SENT TO THE GOVERNMENT [“BIRTH CERTIFICATE”] PROVING BY ACTUAL SIGNATURE [AS CQV CANNOT KNOWINGLY INTELLIGENTLY AND VOLUNTARILY “EXECUTE” B.C. ON THEIR OWN BEHALF AS MINOR INFANT] THAT THE SURETY OF THE COMPANY IS NOT DEAD OR LOST AT SEA BUT A WO/MAN ON THE LAND OF GOOD STANDING, SOUND MIND, LEGAL MAJORITY AND FINANCIAL MATURITY; AND THAT THE PRESUMED PUBLIC [MILITARY] TRUSTEE OF THE COMPANY ESTATE [CORPUS] HAS NOT ACTED IN GOOD FAITH; WHEREFORE ANY SUCH CONTRACTS EXECUTED UNDER THEIR AUSPICES ARE VOID AB INITIO.
THE POLICY UNDERWRITERS ARE GOD AND THE AUTHORS OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE. C.P.A. LLC IS ONLY AN AGENT OF SUCH ASSURANCE BY VIRTUE OF ISSUANCE OF C-COIN UPON CONFERENCE OF POLICY IN CONSIDERATION OF SERVICES RENDERED TO POLICYHOLDER.
The Flagship Program
presenting our flagship program
A Conference of Assurance Policy
“WHAT IS A SURETY SHIP?”
A Fun, Educational Ritual Drama ©️ by Antarah Crawley
⚓️Ministry of Information⚓️
📜BRIEF IN EQUITY📜
A presentment made without express contract presumes the recipient to be the trustee for a dead person’s estate without surety and not a living Cestui Que. An estate may, however, be entrusted to a “person” (corporation) for the use of a living spirit who may “possess property” in the nature of equitable use title not legal title.
There is sufficient precedent in Roman, Papal, and English law to presume a human body to be chattel property (i.e., a dead person or a mere human creature without soul or spirit) unless otherwise established to posses a soul from God. The cestui que who is presumed dead or lost at sea MUST EXPRESSLY STATE that they are indeed the living cestui que to be given standing as one of the three Chancellors in a Court of Equity and Chancery deciding the matter of an estate (dead person). The common law, as it pertains to the military jurisdiction of the public, cannot abrogate a matter of equity respecting a living free man or woman on the land.
Statue of Mortmain prohibits possession of property by the “dead hand” of a corporation (such as the Church); therefore a “person” (dead in the eyes of God) cannot possess property; rather it reverts to the feudal lord.
The Remedy is that the cestui que (beneficiary) possesses equitable title by nature to the property as a living child of god, but never holds the legal title of the trustee which is the feudal lord or its agent, including any person who is a citizen of the jurisdiction.
There is precedence in Germanic law that a man who holds property on account of to the use of another is bound to fulfill his trust.
Furthermore, precedent is found in the Institutes of Justinian at 2.23.1-2: “… it is required that the one heir is duly appointed and is committed to his trust (Fideicommissum) to transfer the inheritance to another; otherwise the testament in which no heir has been duly appointed is void; the words which are properly and commonly used to install a fideicommisum are I beg, I ask, I wish, I entrust…” This doctrine was brought to England by “foreign ecclesiastics” (ministers and consuls) in order to evade the Statute of Mortmain by making the Church cestui a que use le Feoffment fuit fait.
In sum, cestui que use confers the benefit of use of property to another (a minister or consul) without the legal ownership and attendant duties and obligations to the lord and crown as trustee. Compare to usufruct, or right of use of fruits (interest, profits, etc.) of property.
📜PRIVATE OFFERING📜
💾Mindsoft©️as a Service™️ (MaaS™️) Premium Servicing Fee of $99.99 per person 💳 payable upon conference for products* and services rendered. Duration of Service: 1-2 hrs.
Upon completion of conference, Assurance Policyholder may be granted C-Series Art¢oin 🪙 (“C-coin”) at market price via 🤝🏿 Handshake of Friendly Association. Contact ombudserver@gmail.com to schedule a conference, or attend the C.P.A. LLC Quarterly Conference of Assurance Policy.
*The applicant hereof shall be sent the eSyllabus©️™️ Mindsoft©️™️ program file by email under a limed use licensing agreement to facilitate their conference.
📜POLICY COVERAGE📜
An assurance policyholder, having paid a premium and been conferred with assurance (as evidenced by presentment of C-coin), may bring a claim based on presentment to the CPA LLC at no cost, but there is no guarantee that such claim shall be resolved. Processing fees may apply. Neither the CPA LLC nor its parent nor its agents shall be liable for any claim arising from such a presentment or from such policyholder, as the assurance policy itself is underwritten by God in Christ through the King James Bible, and it is to Him thou shalt appeal for judgment.
U:\>_Folder\Assuretyship
Use under 17 U.S. Code § 107
Educational Research Material for a Course in re “Assuretyship”
Supreme Exchange 