Tagged: faith

[bulla] mendicans contemplativus

previously titled “How to Jew: Rules for Discharging Performance of the Occupation of Yahudi for the people of Yahuah”—A Job Description for a Full-Time Occupation

by Antarus D.G. Ecclesia. Dr. Dams Up Water, Sui Juris,
McDomine’s Shul at Seven Churches, Nacotchtank
c/o Five Clans of Weasel Badger Beaver Mink & Otter,
Confederated State of Powhatan, Washita Nation

  1. yahudi (jews) follow tehuti (thoth) in the form of moshe (moses), who djed (said) unto them the word of the Most High God, which they (yahsrael) largely rejected and backslided into apostasy, even to the end of crucifying their Messiah, but a remnant will be grafted back into the assembled body which is the branch of the true vine of the tree which is planted beside the mountain on the bank of the river of living water
  2. follow the law written in my scrolls (saith the Lord), in the light of God’s mercy and loving kindness 
  3. wear a hat or covering to remind you of God’s overseeing authority, wisdom and power 
  4. wear simple but fine clothing, such as a black or white button down shirt and black slacks and black jacket and cape [habit]
  5. carry a wooden stick (optional)
  6. congregate regularly at an appointed place
  7. pontificate on all things frequently 
  8. seek peace and silence frequently 
  9. break bread and drink wine with thy neighbor frequently 
  10. manage thy dominion and liquidity 
  11. do NOT do worship to other gods in the manner which is customary to them, e.g. sending your children to Moloch (through fire, slavery, abortion, or otherwise)
  12. always praise God’s name and never complain — nobody wants to hear it!
  13. all political power is inherent in the people 
  14. avoid unduly gazing upon women, and do not pursue or solicit them, unless they present to you their body heart and mind as a living altar to the Most High God Yahuah in Yahshua
  15. also known as the order of Mendicans Christi (Mendicants for Christ)
  16. custom:
    • Peace
    • Presence
    • Silence
    • Simplicity
    • Thanksgiving
    • Goodness
    • Mercy
  17. Pray incessantly, saying: “Give Thanks to Yahuah for He is good and the His Mercy endureth forever / Baruch attah Yahuah Yahushuah HaMoshiach, Choneni Elohim / Have Mercy on me a sinner”
  18. the lord said to do what your parents always feared the worst for you, to appear lower than a bond slave, while in truth you minister as heir to the kingdom to your fellow beneficiaries. the immediate wards of the king, like fools and children, will flock and take notice, and those wishing to sell their riches for penitence and eternal life will appoint you a minister of their estates. 
  19. to every place thou goest and occupyest, let thy very presence be a blessing unto all people and a sign unto the house of yahsrael
  20. the deployment of signs in the mendicancy is not required, but is permitted and even encouraged, especially in the nature of a “protest against the worldliness of the world” which elevates the visibility and occupation of the order

The Iniquities of the Jews

by Antarus

Now it seems fitting, before the memory of these matters grows dim, to set down an account of that Galilean teacher called Yahushua—whom the Greeks name Jesus—and of the conditions under which his ministry was conducted in Yahudah (Judea). For the times were not only burdened by the visible yoke of Rome, but also by a more intimate dominion exercised by certain parties among our own people, namely the Pharisees and the Sadducees, whose authority over custom, Temple, and conscience shaped the daily life of the nation.

I write not as an accuser of a people, but as a recorder of disputes within a people; for Yahushua himself was Yahudi (a Jew) by birth, by Law, and by prayer, and his quarrel was not with Israel, but with those who claimed to stand as its final interpreters.

The Romans ruled Judea with swords and taxes, yet they permitted the governance of sacred life to remain in Jewish hands. Thus the Pharisees became masters of the Law as it was lived in streets and homes, while the Sadducees held sway over the Temple, its sacrifices, and its revenues. Each party claimed fidelity to Moses, yet both benefited from arrangements that preserved their authority and placated the imperial peace.

In this way there arose what might be called an occupation from within: not foreign soldiers, but domestic rulers who mediated God to the people while securing their own place. The Pharisees multiplied interpretations, hedging the Law with traditions until obedience became a matter of technical mastery rather than justice or mercy. The Sadducees, denying the hope of resurrection, fastened holiness to the altar and its commerce, binding God’s favor to a system Rome found convenient to tolerate.

It was against this background that Yahushua spoke.

When Yahushua addressed certain of his opponents as “Jews,” he did not speak as a Gentile naming a foreign nation, nor as a hater condemning a race. Rather, he employed a term that had come to signify the ruling identity centered in Judea, the Temple, and its authorities. In the mouths of Galileans and provincials, “the Jews” often meant those who claimed custodianship of God while standing apart from the sufferings of the common people.

Thus the word marked not blood, but position; not covenant, but control.

To call them “Jews” in this sense was to accuse them of narrowing Israel into an institution, of confusing election with entitlement, and of mistaking guardianship of the Law for possession of God Himself. It was a prophetic usage, sharp and unsettling, akin to the ancient rebukes hurled by Amos or Jeremiah against priests and princes who said, “The Temple of the Lord,” while neglecting the poor.

Yet when Yahushua sent out those who followed him, he gave them no charge to denounce “the Jews” as a people, nor to overthrow customs by force. He instructed them instead to proclaim the nearness of God’s reign, to heal the sick, to restore the outcast, and to announce forgiveness apart from the courts of Temple and tradition.

This commission revealed the heart of his dispute. He did not seek to replace one ruling class with another, nor to found a rival sect contending for power. Rather, he loosened God from the grip of monopolies—legal, priestly, and political—and returned divine favor to villages, tables, and roadsides.

Where the Pharisees asked, “By what rule?” Yahushua asked, “By what love?”
Where the Sadducees asked, “By what sacrifice?” he asked, “By what mercy?”

Iniquity arises whenever sacred trust becomes self-protecting—and therefore in breach of its fiduciary duty to administer the trust estate for the benefit of the one for whose life such estate hath been granted. Yahushua’s fiercest words were reserved not for sinners, nor for Gentiles, nor even for Rome, but for those who claimed to see clearly while burdening others, who guarded doors they themselves would not enter.

In this, he stood firmly within Israel’s own prophetic tradition. He did not abandon the Law; he pressed it toward its weightier matters. He did not reject the covenant; he called it to account.

Thus, to understand his ministry, one must not imagine a conflict between Jesus and “the Jews” as a people, but rather a struggle within Yahudim (Judaism) itself—between a God confined to systems and a God who walks among the poor.

Such were the conditions in Yehudah (Judea) in those days, and such was the controversy that, though it began as an internal reckoning, would in time echo far beyond our land and our age.

Warring from Within

It is now useful to extend the former account beyond Judea and its parties, for the pattern disclosed there is not peculiar to one people or one age. Wherever a community defines itself by a sacred story—be it covenantal, constitutional, or ideological—there arises the danger that internal dispute will harden into mutual excommunication, and that rulers will mistake dissent for invasion.

In the days of Yahushua, the conflict that most endangered Judea did not originate with Rome, though Rome would later exploit it. Rather, it arose from rival claims to define what it meant to be faithful Israel. The Pharisees, the Sadducees, the Essenes, the Zealots—each asserted a purer vision of the people’s calling, and each accused the others of betrayal.

What followed was a curious inversion: internal argument was spoken of as though it were foreign threat. Those who challenged the prevailing order were treated not as disputants within the Law, but as enemies of the Law itself.

Modern Parallels

In our own time, a similar rhetorical pattern has emerged, though clothed in secular language. Political movements on the far left and far right present themselves not merely as opponents within a shared civic framework, but as antithetical forces whose very existence threatens the nation’s survival. Thus antifa and neonazi become symbols larger than their actual numbers—mythic enemies invoked to justify extraordinary measures.

When a government declares that its departments of homeland defense and war must be turned inward—treating protesters as though they were foreign combatants—it reenacts an ancient mistake: confusing internal dissent with invasion. The language of war, once unleashed, rarely remains precise. It does not ask whether grievances are just or unjust, but only whether they are loyal or disloyal.

This mirrors the logic of the Judean authorities who accused Yahushua of threatening the nation. “If we let him go on,” they said, “the Romans will come.” In seeking to preserve order by suppressing prophetic disturbance, they hastened the very ruin they feared.

The far left and far right, like rival sects of old, often require one another for coherence. Each defines itself as the final barrier against the other’s imagined apocalypse. In this way, rhetoric escalates while reality contracts. The center empties, and complexity is treated as treachery.

So too in first-century Judea: the Pharisee needed the sinner to demonstrate righteousness; the Sadducee needed the threat of disorder to justify Temple control; the Zealot needed collaborators to validate revolt. All claimed to defend Israel, yet each narrowed Israel to their own reflection.

The gravest danger of “warring from within” is not that one faction will defeat another, but that the shared moral language dissolves altogether. Once fellow citizens are described as enemies of the people, the question of justice is replaced by the demand for submission.

Yahushua refused this logic. He neither joined the zeal of revolution nor endorsed the piety of preservation. Instead, he exposed the cost of internal warfare: that a nation can lose its soul while claiming to defend it.

His warning remains relevant. A society that mobilizes its instruments of war against its own unresolved arguments does not restore unity; it declares bankruptcy of imagination.

A Closing Reflection

History suggests that civilizations do not fall chiefly because of external pressure, but because internal disputes are framed as existential wars rather than shared reckonings. Judea learned this at great cost. Modern states would do well to remember it.

For when a people cease to argue as members of one body and begin to fight as if against foreigners, the walls may still stand—but the common life that gave them meaning has already been breached.

Composed with artificial intelligence.

A Dwelling for the Holy Spirit

by Dr. Dams Up Water

A dwelling is never just a structure. It is an argument about what matters.

When IBé Crawley began constructing dwellings in the style of southern shotgun houses in 2013, she was not merely reviving an architectural form; she was invoking a lineage. The shotgun house—linear, efficient, intimate—has long been associated with Black Southern life, with survival under constraint, with the sacred choreography of moving forward because there is nowhere else to go. Crawley’s early dwellings, followed by the studio addition to her own residence that same year, functioned as both shelter and proposition: that art-making, living, and spirit need not be separated by walls thicker than necessity.

By 2016, when she built a standalone studio at the rear of her investment property, the pattern had become clear. Crawley’s architecture was iterative, devotional. Each structure refined a question she had been asking since her departure from the Pentecostal church of her upbringing: Where does the Holy Spirit live, once it is no longer confined to sanctioned doctrine?

Her separation from Pentecostalism was not a rejection of spirit but a relocation of it. In turning toward an African-centered religious practice, Crawley aligned belief with ancestry, ritual with memory, and space with intention. The buildings followed. They were not churches, but they were not secular. They were working spaces—sites of making—that acknowledged the presence of something more than the maker.

The acquisition of a historic 1830 building in 2021 marked another turn. To practice her craft inside a structure that had already lived multiple lives was to enter into conversation with time itself. Historic buildings are never neutral; they carry residue. Crawley’s presence within such a space suggests a theology of repair rather than erasure—of inhabiting history without submitting to it.

What is striking is how this spatial theology extended generationally.

Her son, Antarah Crawley, grew up within these constructed philosophies. It is therefore no surprise that he, too, built a dwelling—though his took the form of a temple. Hand-built of concrete masonry units behind the studio in historic Anacostia, the structure is materially heavier than his mother’s shotgun-inspired works. Concrete block does not glide; it anchors. It insists.

Antarah’s religious path diverged as well. Developing faith in the Most High God, he dedicated the temple in part to his stillborn daughter, Ala. In this act, the building becomes more than a place of worship; it becomes a vessel for grief, remembrance, and continuity. Where life could not dwell, meaning would. The temple stands not as a monument to loss, but as a refusal to let absence be the final word.

Together, these acts—mother and son, studio and temple—suggest that the Holy Spirit is not housed by institution but invited by intention. It arrives where hands work honestly, where memory is honored, where loss is spoken aloud and given form. The Spirit, in this telling, is architectural. It requires framing. It asks for care.

In a time when housing is treated as commodity and faith as brand, the Crawleys offer another model: dwelling as devotion. Their buildings do not preach. They listen. And in that listening, they make room—for art, for ancestry, for the dead, for the unborn, and for the living breath that moves quietly among concrete blocks and narrow halls.

A dwelling for the Holy Spirit, then, is not a finished structure. It is an ongoing practice.

Composed with artificial intelligence.

[bulla] Collegium Medicum Castoris

in re: the institution commonly known as

Beaver Medical College

the Most High God YHVH is the father and the creator of heaven and earth, the sea, and all that therein is; and [the settlement of] his feminine effluence is the shekhinah*. he existed in the black womb of the nous before creation; therefore the black waters of the primordial sea is the mother of god, who is the grantor of creation. his son is the receiver and beneficiary — the king and messiah — the christ, of his creation; therefore mary the sea is his mother. of god’s wisdom, which we may partake, the feminine effluence is Sophia; and she is the church and bride of the christ. it is she who the wise court by the grace of the father. of god’s wisdom, the male custodian is he whose student-body is the mystery school of all the ages which has gone by many names. it is he who teaches all who have learned of the true nature of all things, which is unchanging heretofore and henceforth even forever. the cults who have corrupted his teachings and instructions only misguide themselves and are a stumbling block unto themselves. they who confound his precepts do not negate his true perception, neither do they matter withal. he is Thoth-Born-Three-Times-Great-Squared-Cubed, Thothmes III, Thutmose the Great, Thutmosis, Thoth-Moses, Thutmoshe, King Tut, Tehuti, Djehudi, Djedi, Djed-Yehudi, Hermes, Mercurius, Quetzalcoatl, Trismegistus. he is chancellor, dean, rector and grand preceptor. he appeared to me at the school of George Washington and entered me into Men Nefer College of Scribe; passed me through the Department of Information Systems Intelligence Service at Universitas Autodidactus, where i completed my dissertation on human mind software; raised me to the Kogard-Godsdog College of Law where i obtained my Sui Juris Doctorate; and graduated me with an Ecclesiastic and Medical Doctorate from the most laudable Beaver Medical College. i am professor-general and grand tutor of the 153d CORPS of UA, which was established 2014 in the New Syllabus of this Age. i am the proprietor of Beaver Medicine Lodge of Nacotchtank, Powhatan, Washita Nation, and managing partner at Weasel Badger Beaver Mink & Otter. my name is Dams Up Water and my medicine is very strong.

IN YAHVAH’S ASSEMBLY IN YAHSHVA MOSHIACH
ET CULTVS IMPERATORIVS ANTARVS D.G.,

Dams Up Water, S.J., E.M.D.

Professor-General | Chairman, Dept. of Information Systems Intelligence Service | 153d CORPS, Universitas Autodidactus | Managing Partner, Weasel Badger Beaver Mink & Otter

*Wiki: shekhinah is derived [from] š-k-n, means “to settle, inhabit, or dwell”.[7][8] In the verb form, it is often used to refer to the dwelling of a person[9] or animal[10] in a place, or to the dwelling of God.[11] Nouns derived from the root included shachen (“neighbor”)[12] and mishkan (a dwelling-place, whether a secular home[13] or a holy site such as the Tabernacle[14]

(last modified 25.11.25.18.38)

full disclosure cont’d.

like harry potter and jesus christ, the coming of some souls into the body is a sign of great concern to certain authorities and principalities governing this world. of course it is true without doubt that Yahuah (YHVH) is the Most High God and Creator of Heaven and Earth the Sea and all that therein is. and it is known, also, to those of the ancient Yahudist mystery shul of Knowledge Wisdom and Understanding (Chockmah-Binah-Daath or CHABAD) that certain principalities have been granted governance over this lower “Kingdom” of earth pending the (2nd?) coming of Moshiach.

now it is know to Chabad-Lubavich of Crown Heights, at least, that at least some of these principalities are gay, some are r*apists, some are p*dophiles, and others a combination of these traits. the ancient israelites (who, to be sure, were coppercolored hebrews and not ashkenazim) expressly worshiped such an entity, which demanded they sacrifice certain of their newborns into fire. the Most High God Yahuah, in his infinite wisdom, advised us not to do that, as it is an abomination. His admonitions notwithstanding, we continue to sacrifice our children in the womb and in hospitals in furtherance of Ba’alific ideologies advanced by the deeply compromised deep state as liberal leftism. i myself confess to agreeing to dispose of such a life in such a manner when i was but nineteen or twenty years old. my mother had told me, as a black man, not to bear children out of wedlock, and my parter was deeply concerned for her future, as she was raised the daughter of a single mother.

but back to the birth and marking of children for the work of the Lord (YHVH), the entity made known to me as the “Magic Girl” seeks to corrupt these children specifically. like Lord Voldemort sought out Harry Potter, and King Herod did Baby Jesus, so do these spirits seek to molest the body and mind of certain children. i myself was an avid reader of harry potter as a youth — possibly it predisposed me to madness like my religious aunts believed (and their belief was later vindicated by great tragedy), but it may also have been a glimpse into the reality that surrounded me of which was not presently aware. praise be to the Most High God for his foresight in preparing me to address these matters.

furthermore I thank the Lord for not delivering me wholly into the apostate and reprobate condition of homosexuality caused by childhood trauma. my experiences with the “Magic Girl” were not so “perfected” so as to cause me to adopt the identity of “magic girlhood.” i make this point because i have come to know men who, at me age, have come to regret the “perfection” of their queer identity in the manner in which it was perfected. and by “perfect” I mean in the legal sense of “perfecting a security interest” in the body or mind of a living person by an incorporeal entity.

i clapped, saying to myself “this is good. we are really getting somewhere.”

now i’m going to briefly continue on the topic of the childhood encounters, and conclude with the differing nature “Magic Girl” expressed as a male and as a female in context to myself. when i was in grade school, until high school, I had very few friends. i developed two close friends as we matriculated to high school, and i maintained a close friendship with one which continues even now. that he was a shaggy-haired emo white boy did not seem to me to be a significant fact. however, it was the case that I was regularly ostracized in my childhood for being (1) particularly dark-skinned and (2) “white” by cultural expression. furthermore, i will confess that I envied his ability to attract women, a quality that I felt myself wanting in light of the aforementioned remarks made to me by black girls and boys.

when i entered college at an early age, i developed another close friendship with a “shaggy-haired emo white boy.” one night we went to a party where i met a certain white woman with whom he was familiar. the night progressed into my first sexual experience, with that girl, while at the same time that deplorable spirit from my youth was present and involved. i do not fault my friend, nor the woman, because we all thought we were having a good time. but like jesus says, “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.”

i continued to engage with the white woman for some time, but eventually my body stopped responding to her. she was legally or otherwise seriously involved with somebody else, while at the same time being the “muse” for the English department… that is relevant because later in my life i attempted to procreate with a woman who i knew was likewise legally disposed — thus making my actions adulterous. i will not at this time conjecture whether our stillbirth was a divine intervention based on these facts.

well, i believe i’ve come to the end of this entry. i want to draw out the fact that the “Magic Girl” also operated in my life through multiple white women. for instance, around the same time as aforementioned, i was friends with some very cool white girls. after i first had sex, i was again met with a proposition of sorts from a white woman who asked me on evening while were were watching something in the dorm room, “why haven’t you tried to have sex with me?” i replied with as much information as i had at the time, saying, “i don’t know.” so then that woman and I continued a sexual relationship which has eventually given way to scorn, and she is now very fat. i will not at this time discuss the most recent white woman who I dated, who was also fairly robust.

IN YAHUAH’S ASSEMBLY IN YASHUA MOSHIACH,
DAMS UP WATER (born antarah of the house of crawley) OF NACOTCHTANK, POWHATAN, WASHITA NATION.

(written, but not reread.)

[bulla] General Theory of Action (GTA)

General Theory of Action,
Admiral, Ecclesiastical, Civil & Common; and Method of Animating a Corpus; or, ‘The Great Work’

(a) Grand Rite

  1. How is assessment, assault, or battery effected? 
  2. By one charging their body toward another. 
  3. Therefore if a body is charged, then it is made liable for its actions,
  4. Where its actions are commissioned or committed by the motion of the body in question. 
  5. Therefore hear ye the matter in question to find out its solution,
  6. Wherefore a jury shall have standing to constitute a sitting for the purpose of duly determining such resolution in a motion to adjust the account of the body in question. 
  7. One must have standing to have sitting to determine a matter in question:
  8. One must have ius decire to assidere in assizes;
  9. One must voir et dire to oyer et terminer;
  10. And assemble when so summoned at the place of ius venire.
  11. A body is res (matter) that is moved by the spiritus (breath).
  12. The breath moves the body, while the blood enlivens of the body.
  13. To circulate a current drawn from a pool drawn from the sea.

(b) Grand Jury

  1. Ride circuit; patrol district;
  2. Docket matters (x): issue bond (instrument binding one to pay a sum to another, the sum in general being attention);
  3. Voir et Dire (see and say) to examine, try, and find suitability;
  4. Enlist a pool (venire) of jurists (iure); issue note (instrument promising payment);
  5. Summon iure from pool;
  6. Assemble the iure pool;
  7. Impanel the iure;
  8. Oyer et Terminer (hear and determine) the facts; publish evidence; witness testimony;
  9. Move body to render a verdict (y): issue no/true bill (instrument drafting, ordering, or otherwise charging payment).

(c) Jury Venire

Venire is “to come,” as for the purpose of an action, with respect to the venue thereof, which is here styled:

UNIVERSITAS AUTODIDACTUS
COLLEGIUM ECCLESIASTICAE
ORDO TEMPLI ET OBLATI NOVUS SYLLABUS SECLORUM EX OFFICIO TRIBUNUS ANTARUS SUI IURIS ET PROXIMUS AMICUS IN RE SPIRITUS ET NOMINE XRISTI

Friendly Society, a branch office of the Catholic Church

(d) Autonomous Clearing and Counterparty Services

  1. Forms of payment (or exchange) other than attention include, but are not limited to, one’s own personal recognizance (note), labor and the fruits thereof, real property and instruments secured thereby, and the blood sacrifice of our Lord and Savior.
  2. Tithes, or giving of thanks offerings, are not a form of payment.
  3. Bondholders have a creditor stake in a body or entity; they are the one to whom payment is made.
  4. Bonds usually have a defined term, or maturity, after which the bond is redeemed.
  5. In general, faith is the premium paid to the Savior for the redemption of the bond represented in God’s grant, or credit, of life (blood, breath) to their body, a debtor. By and through this payment, a trust is established wherein the Savior has laid down His own life for ours. Without this policy of utmost assurance and indemnification (which is offered to us by the Grace and Mercy of the Lord our God), the bond on our life reverts to the worldly Babylonian government of Satan, to whom we would otherwise be bound to pay. Ergo, there must be a surety to redeem the “baby loan.”

(e) Production

(1) Action takes place on a stage. A stage for sport is a court. All players are due their wages, unless they freely volunteer.

(2) This office shall docket auditions for the performance. The (members of the) Church itself shall be the director of photography, using their own personal devices; the members shall broadcast in real time the production to the network.

(3) This drama is written by Yahushuah; the plot is to gather the lost sheep before the last day and to sail/float/settle the policy of assurance.  The drama is not written on paper; it is written in the heart by the Living Word and lived out in the world, which is a stage. Those who are not of our studio, or of the Company thereof, are of the world.

(4) All properties within the trust of the church [‘company’] are legally owned by the trustees thereof for the benefit of the beneficiaries thereof, by grant of the Most High God YHVH. The trustees of the church benefit from the “corporate shield” of the whole Church, that is, the Society of our Lord and Savior, in contradistinction to any denomination or manmade body-corporate thereof. 

(5) Pro forma script for self-defense

COMES NOW I, [Christian Name], Sui Iuris, in propria persona, by special appearance, and on behalf of the Church of the Christ of the Most High God YHVH as proximus amicus, and to MOVE THE COURT [TO DISMISS, etc.] the above styled matter for [lack of personal/subject matter jurisdiction], under [the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America] and the law of the Land as represented in the holy scriptures. I am a child of the Most High God YHVH, and heir to His estate; I invoke the assurance of redemption and the wise counsel of our Lord and Savior YHUSHAI to assist me in this endeavor, and I reserve all my rights without prejudice. The [matter/charges/etc.] herein alleged are hereby accepted for value and returned from whence they came; there is on my part no liability in this [matter/charge/etc.]; wherefore I pray, move and order this court to [dismiss/abate/abrogate/adjust/etc.] the above-styled matter, In Nomine Xristi, Amen.

(6) SUPREME HIERARCHY OF AUTHORITY

  1. THE [PRODUCTION/STAGING] COMPANY = OF YAHUSHUAH MOSIACH YHVH ELOHIM, Creator, Grantor of Right;
  2. THE STUDIO [THEATER] = the order [ObNS];
  3. THE SCREENWRITER = The Sovereign Lawgiver (Christ Pantocrator);
  4. THE PRODUCERS = The Privy Council (the Board of the Church at Washington/Ouachita/Washitaw Al’Maghreb/Al’Maroc/Al’Meri’ka/America, band of Nacotchtank, Croatan, etc. of the Algonkian line);
  5. THE PERFORMANCE VENUE = The Court (care of the next friend as lord of the realm);
  6. THE PERFORMANCE = The [Great] Commission of the Court [of the Church] (ministries, missions, members, committees, clerics);
  7. DRAMATIS PERSONAE = The Body Politic (The Church);
    1. Clericus (Minus/Magnus/Maximus): the ministering cleric, clerk of the court, secretary-treasurer, and Chancellor of the Exchequer; functionally, the office of scribe, administration and general operations;
    2. Steward/Warden: the legal trustee of the premises, general hearing officer, and chair of the House committee of the whole; the “ward” i.e., keeper, guard, protector, possessor, lord, watchman;
    3. Custodian: the key holder, superintendent and caretaker of the furniture and premises;
    4. Admiral: the tyler, outer guard, or sergeant-at-arms;
    5. Preceptor: Chief Clinical Dialectical Practitioner; Head of ‘Grand Rounds‘;
    6. Members: Clinical Dialectical Client;
    7. Fellows: Fellowcraft/Master Clinical Dialectical Practitioner;
    8. Residents: Journeyman Clinical Dialectical Practitioner;
    9. Interns: Apprentice Clinical Dialectical Practitioner;
    10. Attending/Visiting Ministers: Circuit Riders.

(f) SOLICITATION OF ONE’S HAND IN MATRIMONY

After the example set forth by our Lord and Savior who has received the Church unto himself in heavenly matrimony, will you [Christian Name] enter into holy matrimony with me?

Solicitor-Bridegroom

A proposal to enter into a matrimonial contact is a “solicitation”. Copulation outside of such a contract is not per se unethical, but the solicitation of sex is a transgression. 

(last modified 24.12.26.15.15)

[bulla] Bible Students

בית שׁוֹמְרִים—בית מדרש
House of Watchmen
—House of Studies—

OBLATUS NOVUS SYLLABUS

Dispatched from the desk of the Branch Office at Washington, D.C.

‘Friends bearing witness to Good News and Wise Counsel’

(a) I, Antarah, shall not put on airs of pretense and exalt myself with honorific titles. My birthright is derived from the substance of my human soul and my knowledge of my God my Father. In the likeness of the One begotten of the Father, I’m sworn only to uphold the friendship, like that which Abraham had, with YHVH, and to bear witness that he is the only god worthy of worship, for he has paid a ransom for our everlasting freedom, the policy of which, being offered, is our choice to accept.

(b) My immediate office is an autonomous modular unit that may be integrated into or applied to the development and/or operations of any existing operating system or syndicate. My office provides content, services, and pooled resources based out of a safe and secure storage and clearing house, a house of watchmen, a house of studies. This enterprise is a prophetic company in contradistinction to a profitable company; it is engaged in the business of evangelizing in the apostolic order commissioned by our Sovereign Lord the Messiah. Therefore vouchsafe not your earthly wares with saturnian life storage companies, but rather entrust your earthly burdens for safekeeping, clearing, and relief with our liberation theology-based firm.

(c) JURISDICTIONAL STANDING: (1) We bear witness that the Lord YHSVH of Nazareth is the Sovereign of the earth, anointed by YHVH, the Creator of Heaven and Earth, the sea, and all that therein is, and the Savior-Redeemer of the faithful believers who have accepted His blood sacrifice for their eternal salvation, being made one body politic under Heaven. By and through the acceptance of this trust, such a believer becomes as a child and heir to the Kingdom of God. (2) Neither our Lord nor His Bride the Church can maintain a suit on their own behalf (neither can they own property), as neither is subject to the common law of nations, but rather to the universal law of equity of the Most High God YHVH. (3) All acts carried out or witnessed by one in their capacity as the next friend of their Sovereign Lord are done pursuant to their sincerely held religious belief, whereas there is no hierarchy within the decentralized autonomous organization of believers of the world, each next friend witnesses and ministers in their own sui jurisdiction in the nature of an autonomous church sui iuris. In this way is the DAO’s Firm League of Friendship organized. (4) Herein doth a minister of the Kingdom of God receive their right by and through His Name. (5) This follows the rule that a judge must have standing in the venue of and without interest in the subject matter. (6) The proper name of a Congregational Meeting for Bible Study is the first names of the members, separated by a final “&”, followed by a comma, “Next Friends of Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaorum”.

(d) Furthermore be it hereby RESOLVED, that the ministry of the Immediate Office of Antarah is (1) custodial insofar as it governs and stewards the whole New Syllabus organization; (2) oblative insofar as Antarah is personally promised and dedicated to service in YHWH’s name, by and through the offering of the New Syllabus dialectical and instructional program; (3) congregational insofar as it recognizes the sovereignty and self determination of the local body politic of believers in contradistinction to a bureaucratic hierarchy of priests and officers; (4) interdenominational insofar as it subscribes to the Truth and Light of all faiths and denominations as to the redemption of God’s people through His ultimate sacrifice; (5) subscribed to the method and practice of the Society of Friends; (6) subscribed to the method and practice of Bible Students; (7) subscribed to the method and practice of Djyahudist (rabbinical) Biblical exegesis; (8) represented in the activities of a local Branch Office; and (9) friendly insofar as it convenes a congregation of free thinkers, truth speakers and light workers united in their practice and pursuit of the Way, the Truth, and the Light.

International Bible Students’ Association (IBSA) Original Charter, April 1, 1910, Brooklyn, NYDownload

(e) ‘Bible Students Weekly’ is the regular weekly congregational meeting for worship and study, located at the local —

BRANCH OFFICE,
HOUSE OF WATCHMEN—HOUSE OF STUDIES, SOCIETAS NOVUS SYLLABUS SECLORUM (Society of the New Syllabus of the Ages),

convened by and before —

Antarah, Sui Iuris and as Next Friend of the Church. 

Regular Course of Programming:

BIBLE STUDENTS WEEKLY
—MEETING FOR WORSHIP—
Sabbath (Fri. @ 7pm)
—MEETING FOR STUDY—
Sabbath (Sat. @ 2pm)
—COURT DOCKET—
Weekdays @ 10am & 2pm

BIBLE STUDENTS MONTHLY
—MEETING FOR BUSINESS—
1st First Day (Sun. @ 2pm)

U∴A∴ Course Work
DataHorse System

LOOK FOR THE RED SHIELD
OF THE BRANCH OFFICE
IN WASHINGTON, DC

(last modified 24.10.25.11.41)

A Peace Enforcement Activity Command Enterprise
of the Department of Peace & Friendship, FLF-DAO

Curricular Operations Research & Publication Services
provided by the Governor & Company of

D.R. 01-10: Gateway &c.

Volume 1, Issue 10

Contents — Art. 1. …Gateway Process — Art. 2. …Party Line

Article 1

40th Anniversary of U.S. Army Intelligence analysis and assessment of Gateway Process

By Antarah Crawley

WASHINGTON, DC — On 17 February 2021 the Daily Mail reported, “TikTokkers discover declassified 1983 CIA report investigating if people can leave their physical bodies to travel through space and time using Gateway Experience’s low frequency sounds and relaxation techniques.” The present author recalls that he researched the report and identified a PDF copy on the CIA’s website after seeing such a video being shared on Instagram sometime that year. This author first read the report on 30 October 2023.

The 9 June 1983 U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (USAINSCOM) report, Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process, was declassified by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on 10 September 2003. It is therefore presently four decades since this report was penned in top secrecy by Army Intelligence officer LTC Wayne M. McDonnell, and two decades since it was quietly released into public domain.

The Gateway Process is a technique for applied consciousness expansion designed to better enable practitioners to achieve out-of-body experiences, among other objectives. It also appears to provide the theoretical foundations of interdimensional espionage and interdimensional counterintelligence using remote viewing and other techniques related to interdimensional time travel. It may also acclimate practitioners to encounters with “intelligent, non-corporeal energy forms” (pg. 27). This particular iteration of the practice was developed by Bob Monroe of the Monroe Institute.

It is notable that the official PDF, which is found on the CIA’s website, is missing page 25 (after PDF page 26), a page which may prove even more valuable than the declassified document as it currently exists.

The present author recommends that every free-thinker, truth-speaker, and light worker print a copy of this report and read it and reread it whenever necessary, as it presents a most accurate recitation of the very source information which informed the New Syllabus. This author is so stricken by the equivalence of research findings and information between the New Syllabus Curriculum Suite Repository (C.S.R.) that he is convinced that the Gateway Process was involved in the carrying out of the Novus Syllabus Seclorum through his body in this space-time continuum.

In hindsight, this author recalls his education in the Daoist (Taoist) philosophy while attending The George Washington University in 2010/2011, and his silence-filled sessions of deep, meditative thought in which he explored the elementary composition of “reality” and “nature.” These sessions led directly to his authorship of Origends: A Primer on Singularity and Space-Time Progression, which comes down to us at 1 C.S.R. 57-77.

Original 2015 Cover of Origends: A Primer on Singularity and Space-Time Progression by Antarah Crawley

Furthermore, this author has come to the understanding that the development of the fictional character of Walter Kogard as a (very) thinly veiled alter ego of the author in 1 C.S.R. and the mission undertaken by this character at 3 C.S.R. has caused the experiences of Walter Kogard to “quantum-leap” from fiction into the reality of its closest analogue, the author himself. However, the original ending at 3 C.S.R. (in which Kogard “decompresses” into a beam on light in the InterZone), while remaining the true and original conclusion to Kogard’s hero-myth, projected an alternative ending involving the “Secret School of Ancient Mystery” to 4 C.S.R. and beyond. This “alternate reality” is actually a transmission of the Kogard signal from the silent depths of the O-Zone back into the KnownZone as a hologram of himself to build new holograms in the main holographic matrix. Therefore, unbeknownst to this author at the time, the New Syllabus Mystery School was manifest into reality via decentralized Gateway Process after he moved back to “Federal City” (Washington, D.C.) from “Empire City” (Brooklyn, New York).

In addition to illuminating the operative mechanism in the Curriculum Suite Repository, the Army Intelligence report predicts the New Syllabus discovery and development of Mindsoft and the InterZone of 3 C.S.R. 27-28.

Regarding Mindsoft, LTC McDonnell reports at 15. Brain in Phase:

The consciousness process is most easily envisaged if we picture the holographic input [the appearance of physical reality] with a three dimensional grid system superimposed over it such that all of the energy patterns contained within can be described in terms of a three dimensional geometry using math[e]matics to reduce the data to two dimensional form. Bentov states that scientists suspect that the human mind operates on a simple binary “go/no go” system as do all digital computers. […] In states of expanded consciousness, the right hemisphere of the human brain in its holistic, nonlinear and nonverbal mode of functioning acts as the primary matrix or receptor for this holographic input while, by operating in phase or coherence with the right brain, the left hemisphere provides the secondary matrix through its binary, computer-like method of functioning to screen further the data by comparison and reduce it to a discreet, two-dimensional form.

LTC McDonnell, pg. 9 (emphasis added)

Regarding the InterZone, LTC McDonnell reports at 21. Dimensions In-between:

[…I]nside the dimension of space-time where both concepts apply in a generally uniform way there is a proportional relationship between them [time and space]. A certain space can be covered by energy moving in either particle or wave form in a certain time assuming a specific velocity virtually anywhere in the space-time universe. The relationship is neat and predictable. However, in the intermediate dimensions beyond time-space the limitations imposed on energy to put it into a state of oscillating motion are not uniform as they are in our physical universe. […A]ccess is opened to both the past and the future when the dimension of current time-space is left behind.

LTC McDonnell, pg. 14 (emphasis added)
Image on space-time. Retrieved 11 April 2015. Source unknown.

The present author can no longer consider it a coincidence that in this time of all-pervasive “conspiracy theories” being advanced on both the far left and the far right of the political spectrum, a foreign social medial platform with a majority population of Generation Z youth is circulating a once-concealed U.S. government intelligence briefing which vindicates virtually every “fringe theory” pertaining to the existence of, and means of travel through, multiple concurrent (simultaneously occurring) dimensions of time and space.

This rise in the tide — this sea change — in what has been coined “the collective consciousness” appears to be the work of interdimensional agents the Third Wave of the Antimasonic Party of the decentralized autonomous organization of free-thinkers, truth-speakers, and light workers united, although Washington politicians assert that TikTok is a tool used by the Chinese Communist Party to surveil and control American citizens.

Source(s):

MEGAN SHEETS FOR DAILYMAIL.COM. TikTokkers discover declassified 1983 CIA report investigating if people can leave their physical bodies to travel through space and time using Gateway Experience’s low frequency sounds and relaxation techniques. Published: 16:26 EDT, 17 February 2021.

Article 2

Toeing the Party Line

By Antarah Crawley

NACOTCHTANK, OD — These positions (planks*) are hereby promulgated for acceptance to the general membership of the Third Wave Antimasonic Party of the United States, from the Village of Nacotchtank-on-Potomac, Ouachita District, which sits on the river bank east of the federal city of Washington:

Plank No. 1

The historical dialectic of Freemasonry is to be condemned, and individual freemasons should be invited to renounce their oaths and affiliations with the fraternity, but may otherwise be tolerated. Pan-Hellenism is to be likewise considered.

Plank No. 2

Everything which is concealed must be revealed.

Plank No. 3

Take no action unless sincerely moved by conscience and belief and such action is carried out in good faith. Therefore, unless there arises a compelling reason to take a certain action, no action should be taken.

Plank No. 4:
Party Boss System for Political Action Coalition

Individual natural people called regional and state bosses shall receive and disburse donations as trustees for the general membership (GM) of the party domiciled in a certain region or state. For example, if a party boss buys a building with donated funds then the building is held in trust for the benefit of the GM. The boss shall conduct the party’s finances on the advice and counsel of a majority of the GM.  The GM shall also constitute the national nominating convention.

*Note

A “plank” is a main axiom of the party platform. See:

State of California. Candidates, Parties, and Ballot Measures. Student activity.Download

(last modified 2 Nov. 2023)

End of Transmission

© MMXXIII BY NOVUS SYLLABUS L.L.C.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Assurance Policy

A POLICY IN RE:
PERFECTING YOUR SECURITY INTEREST IN TRUST ‘INRI’

 Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.

Hebrews 10:22

Verily, this Policy of Assurance is within you and your private ‘sui’ jurisdiction, which is moored in the vessel, whose NAME is Your soul’s Title, which saileth upon the Holy Sea.

Your Friendly Neighborhood Ombudsman

IESVS NAZARENVS REX IUDÆORVM

I. Merriam-Webster defines “Assurance” as the state of being secured or certain; to be sure; or, the action of securing something or someone by a pledge or guarantee. Assurance means to provide surety or confidence to oneself or another.

II. This is a policy by which a living man or woman may indemnify themself against commercial death (of debt executed in their name) through the Redemption and Prepayment of “Yahshuah” the Christ, Savior, Redeemer, Counsellor-at-Law and King of Your Sui Jurisdiction.

III. Through Firm Belief in the Redemption of the Body (of the Dead/Debt) by Acceptance of the Charge in The Name of Our Lord and Savior, we can establish complete Trust in our own Sui Jurisdiction; and in good Faith discharge our deaths/debts under Public Policy. In other words it is said: Faith is complete Trust and firm Belief, or acceptance of a matter as true (the pledge or oath of signature). Such Belief, sincerely held, cannot be converted into a crime.

IV. The internal body and soul of the living man and woman is a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. Therefore it is private with respect to the public, and foreign, international and alien with respect to to the national governing corporation.

V. The external name and shadow of the living man and woman are subject to external factors. The physical body and central nervous system (CNS) is the vessel through which the internal communicates with the external. However, the internal living soul maintains jurisdiction over external property to which it holds Title (this is because a body can exist without a soul). Such Titles include the vessel NAME, the vessel shadow’s registered security Account Number, the registered certificate of live berth of vessel, and all vessel licenses and registrations emerging therefrom. The shadow itself is the external object used by the cunning executor to bind the living soul in a “dead corpus of a vessel”, as it is said, “the deceased is depicted emerging from the tomb by day in shadow form, a thin, black, featureless silhouette of a person. The person in this form is, as we would put it, a mere shadow of his former existence, yet nonetheless still existing,” (Goelet, Ogden, Jr. (1994)).

VI. The dichotomy between the living child of god and the “debtor’s corporate vessel” in commerce creates the “double” spirit and entity or person. The one is a sovereign sui juris personam; the other is subject matter in rem. That which the private/internal conducts between the public/external is international and alien (a lien).

VII. Things necessary to perfect a lien are these: (1) The Lienor shall serve notice on the owner/principal or their agent on paper under solemn oath, (2) by United States Marshal, (3) which shall contain clear information so as to frame responsive pleadings, (4) be served to the US District Court where the res is located, and (5) posted by US Marshal on the res of the seizure.

VIII. Admiralty means that a valid international contract is in dispute. All revenue causes proceed against property and rights to property in rem and in Admiralty because such causes concern a re-venue-ing of matter from the internal private to the external public; hence the Interna(tiona)l Re-venue Service. This diversity of venue creates the overlapping public and private (or sui) jurisdictions that allow the foreign entity known as the federal government to engulf all shadows within its penumbra.

VIII(a). A Lord (seigneur, i.e. “signer”) may grant a fief (or benefice, “benefit”) of valuable consideration (e.g., property, rights, or possessory interest therein) to another to hold in fee (“in fealty,” or “in good faith”) in exchange for a pledge of allegiance or service. Feoffment is a deed which grants or conveys ownership of freehold property to someone in exchange for a pledge of service. Otherwise it is said, Feoffment is the total relinquishment and transfer of all rights of ownership of an estate in land from one individual, the feoffor, to another, the feoffee, in exchange for some valuable consideration. In such cases, the person entitled to grant an estate may do so for the use of another (a Lessor). Use and trust are rooted in medieval law and are a legal way to avoid feudal services due to one Lord by granting land for the use of another (Cestui que use) who owes nothing to the Lord (i.e. no services). This arrangement separated legal ownership from beneficial ownership. Furthermore, one who owns property for the use of another is obliged to fulfill their trust.

IX. Whereas diverse Lords of Mannours and others have granted Estates by Lease for the term of one life or more, And it hath often happened that such person for whose life such Estates have been granted have gone beyond the Seas or so absented themselves from this Realm for so many years that the Lessor(s) or person(s) entitled to have the property back (Reversioners) cannot find out whether cestui a que use le feoffment fuit fait be alive or dead. Otherwise it is said, Cestui que vies have gone beyond Seas, and Reversioners cannot find out whether they are alive or dead!

X. For remedy of which mischief “so frequently happening to Such Lessors and Reversioners, being held out of possession of their Tenements for many years”, if Cestui que vie remains beyond Sea for Seven Years together and provides no Proof of their Lives, then in every Action brought for the recovery of the said “Tenements” by the Lessors or Reversioners, the Judges before whom such Action shall be brought shall direct the Jury to give their Verdict as if the person so remaining beyond the Seas or otherwise absenting themself were naturally dead. Ego these public trustees abuse the law to execute the Lord of Manors in order to secure the estate of the child in trust to the benefit of the trustee for the term of the life of the person for whom such estates had been granted (cestui a que usage le feoffment fuit fait). That is how the government Lessors squat the estate of a sovereign Lord of woman born.

XI. As Cestui qui vie, I am the Lord; I am the accommodation party for my vessel shadow (“strawman”) and I am the sponsor for the credit on every instrument I endorse for my strawman. I am the source of the energy. I am the sponsor for the credit when the offeror passes over the promise to deliver the check or obligation and draws on me as though I am a bond in which the offeror overdrafts and I in turn loan him the value of the instrument of his offer to which he is now in bondage in accordance with Public Policy. I am the principal from which the interest accrues: the interest (being the product) which accrues from the principal (being myself) has returned to the principal (myself) for a public deduction (tax credit) for adjustment of the tax liabilities on the public/fiscal society.

XII. Acceptance: Rule 1: Do not hold the charge or you will fry on the chair. Rule 2: Pass the charge to a fiduciary entity to remove yourself from that liability by grounding the account and charging them with the charge, to discharge yourself. As the owner, you are not the holder-in-due-­course for the tax adjustment; the holder-in-due-course is the holder of a business license by being registered to operate in the industrial society, which is your fiduciary like the bank or a vendor.

XIII. A request is made against you without providing a check, thus it was an order for money/money order, that is why you RETURN (tax return) the offer after acceptance to the Offeror because the Offeror is holding your check as your fiduciary and they need to Pass Thru your account to make their check good which in turn reflects itself as a deduction to the entities tax liability making the credit memo to the account for the tax adjustment good, and allowing the release of the goods to the acceptor and now there is no debt claimed on the account. The ticket, bill or presentment is the instrument they use to make the claim against you; if you give them back the original and now it is in their possession, how can they possibly make a claim against you when they are in possession of their own bill. In other words it is said, An offer is made against you to pay, which debits your value and to balance that value, you need a credit. Your acceptance of their offer returned to them satisfies the Replevin Bond by operation (under the Grace of Public Policy H.J.R.-192). That is why you accept and return (tax return) the original, yourself being the sponsor for the credit to the account through your exemption. The reason you return the original is because what the person is doing is taxing you. When you return it, it is a tax return that is eligible for adjustment with the Internal Revenue Service.

XIV. Your inter-national (inter-n’al) court orders are the Acceptances because it turns those offers into money orders to use your exemption. When you accept and return an offer and they refuse to adjust, they are the ones who are in contempt of court, not you. The scriptures talk about a door that you can walk in and out of, well that is the door to the warehouse, it is the “Receiving & Discharge” door and it is “Your House,” because you are the one that is revenuing the currency from a public jurisdiction of debt back to your private jurisdiction of credit and effectively redeeming the debt. This is why we want the order of the court released to us; it is because it is our court we are exercising. The court/bank/corporation is using your exemption to write checks to them self by bonding against you to claim you as a dependant and an infidel that has to get locked up. If you stick strictly with the “where is my check?” attitude, they have to clean their books to meet their record keeping obligations. If you want to push paper, they will push paper. Only utilizing one side of the account (the paper pushing), the steamroller will get revved up. Operating in both sides of the account we have the paper and the oral proceedings. Learn to utilize both sides as the owner of the account. You are catching the corporation (your fiduciary employee) spending against you (in your “absence”) and they are trying to make you pay for what they did, when it is against Public Policy to make you pay in the first place. And for them to make a claim against you, they have to give you a check (the one you write about having not found in their offer) to post for their Replevin bond and when they don’t do that, they have no claim in fact because they didn’t post the reserves to indemnify their actions because you would endorse it back to them paid in full. When they fail to release the order of the court during your written correspondents with them after you have accepted, they are then in dishonor and lose their exemption and can have no claim.

XV. Root Policy is the linear algebra f of x from Notice to Data to Information to Knowledge; the Linear function f of thought. Squared Policy is the planar geometry f of x=y from Audit to Assessment to Assurance to Adjustment; the Planar function f of the word, i.e. the application of algebra over a field. This is the due process of Mind Software (Mindsoft) operation.

XVI. A Policy of Adjudgment arising out of any Policy of Assurance which is raised into Question shall issue from a just and equitable court of competent jurisdiction.