Update: UC3 version 1.18.22 hereby replaced with 1.20.22 (“3rd Ed.”)

IMPORTANT – READ CAREFULLY BEFORE DOWNLOADING, ACCESSING OR USING THIS OR ANY PRODUCT SUPPLIED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY BY ANTARAH CRAWLEY (“NEW SYLLABUS”) (THE “AUTHOR”).

BY ACCESSING OR USING OUR PRODUCT AND OUR SERVICES, YOU (THE “USER”) HEREBY AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE FOLLOWING LIMITED USE LICENSE (“AGREEMENT”) AND ALL TERMS INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO ABIDE BY THIS AGREEMENT, CEASE AND DESIST FROM (OR DO NOT ACCESS) THIS DOCUMENT, FILE(S), PASSWORD, AND ALL RELATED SERVICES (THE “PRODUCT”). This product and its use are protected by Intellectual Property Rights owned or controlled by the Author. Access to the product conveys to User only a limited, non-transferable license to use the product solely for internal research purposes conducted by User. This license specifically excludes any Non-Licensed Use. User acknowledges that the Author is not obliged to transfer any additional know-how or technology to User or to provide User with any consulting services to implement or use the product. The User may transfer (but not resell) the product and/or information or materials made through the User’s access to the product to another only if such transfer is genuinely required for User to use the product for internal research use, and such transfer is not for any Non-Licensed Use, and provided that such recipient agrees in writing (a) not to transfer the product or any such materials to any third party, and (b) to use such transferred information and materials solely for the internal research purposes of User and not for any Non-Licensed Use. Except as expressly permitted, the User must not sell or otherwise transfer: (a) the product, (b) its components and/or derivatives, or (c) materials made using or incorporating the product, to a third party. For information on purchasing a license to the product for purposes other than internal research use, contact the Author at director@newsyllabus.org. The Author is entitled to terminate this Limited Use License with immediate effect if the User breaches any of its terms, in which event User must immediately destroy the product(s) subject to such breach and all information or materials made through the User’s use of such product(s). The following disclaimer of warranties and indemnification from User will survive any termination of this Limited Use License. UNLESS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN A SEPARATE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AUTHOR AND USER FOR THE SALE AND PURCHASE AND USE OF THE PRODUCT, THE AUTHOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND WITH THE PRODUCT AND ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, ALL OF WHICH ARE PROVIDED AND LICENSED “AS IS”, “WITH ALL FAULTS”, AND WITH NO WARRANTY EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AND SPECIFICALLY WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, ACCURACY, SUFFICIENCY, NON-INFRINGEMENT, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE AUTHOR ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY WHATSOEVER (WHETHER IN CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY IN TORT OR OTHERWISE) WITH RESPECT TO THE USE BY THE USER OF THE PRODUCT OR ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OF THE AUTHOR OR ANY THIRD PARTY. UNLESS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN A SEPARATE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AUTHOR AND USER FOR THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF THE PRODUCT, USER SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE AUTHOR HARMLESS FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES, COSTS, EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES WITH RESPECT TO THE PRODUCT AND THE USE THEREOF BY USER. In this Limited Use License: “Intellectual Property Rights” means and includes patent rights, copyrights, trademark and service mark rights, trade secret rights and rights in know-how and proprietary information, and other proprietary rights and intellectual property rights of any kind or nature anywhere in the world. “Non-Licensed Use” means: (a) use of the product in manufacturing; (b) inclusion of the product as part of another product; (c) use of the product in connection with the provision of any service for compensation, including research services for third parties; (d) use of the product for any unauthorized commercial purpose; (e) use of the product in writing, scrip, or software of any kind, or for consumption by or use in connection with or administration or application to any commercial purpose; (f) resale, lease, license, or distribution of the product, or any components or derivatives thereof, whether or not for research use; (g) any modification of the product, and (h) any other use of the product other than internal research use.

Notes

UC3 version 1.5.22 hereby replaced with 1.18.22 (“2nd Ed.”)

N.B. (NOTA BENE: “TAKE NOTICE”) — UC3 was drafted based on PUBLIC LAW 88-243–DEC. 30, 1963, Title 28 D.C. Code version of Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 1-207, which has since been amended to 1-308–Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.

N.B. Amendment 1 UCC 3-2 — (1) A “current” is a current fund existing in an asset or account which may be liquidated in money. A synonym for “current” is “present”, which may be made by presentment for current funds due and payable; as a demand for acceptance or payment made upon the maker, acceptor, drawee or other payor by or on behalf of the holder (UCC 3-501). “Present sales” are made under contract. In an alternating wave current, a present once made in credit may be accrued in debt, and if “presents” are not honored then “presence” may be summoned “in personam” to a court of the “Lex Mercatoria”. (2) A “draft” is made when there is an action of pulling something along, as with a presentment for current funds; such include bills of exchange, promissory notes, bank-checks, and other negotiable instruments (“commercial paper”). A draft is the depth of water necessary to float a ship. (3) Negotiable means capable of being transferred by endorsement or delivery, which is to say that any writing signed by the maker or drawer (“instrument”) which is sent containing an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in money on demand or at a definite time is negotiable. (4) One who signs unconditionally on a promise or order to pay which they are sent thereby makes themself liable in personam subject matter drawn through the commercial “sea”. (5) In summary, “currency” is the medium of exchange of negotiable instruments, whose subject matter is man-made. Negotiable instruments (“currents”) transmitted through the total universe of such instruments (“sea”) constitute the “current-sea”, which functions by virtue of being like a real sea, except by artificial man-made incorporation. The man-made purpose of this “sea” is to float a “ship of state” (“corporation”) with “commercial” jurisdiction over the material world. 17 Jan. 22.

N.B. Amendment 1 UCC 3-6.1 — A natural person is not a “corporation” and not subject to obligations of a corporation, which is an “artificial person” created by the engrafted implied powers of Article I Civil Subject Matter and Art. II Maritime-Admiralty jurisdiction. Natural personam born within the borders of this land are entitled to the privileges and immunities enumerated in the Bill of Rights. 17 Jan. 22.

Download eText

White Paper on (Human)Blockchain Programming:
How to apply C:\ language to see yourself squared.
By Ombudsman Antarah A. Crawley,
Sov. Grand Scribe,
NS, DISIS, OPSCOM,
Holy C Corp., Incorpl.

ABSTRACT: (human)object-oriented programming is a new procedural approach to developing cognitive-behavioral mind-software for human operating systems, characterized as “a dialectic information processing systemtheory” applied using Holy C:\ language. 

Like the fields of science, information technology, engineering, and mathematics (SITEM), “dialectic information processing systemtheory” (DIPST) involves writing computer programs. As information processors, we write programs for the human cognitive behavioral (cogb) operating system, or “mind”. We write programs that amplify, or square, human(mind)processing on both individual and “collective consciousness” scale. In order to write scalable programs that are correct, readable, modifiable, affordable, and efficient, we have developed the Holy C:\ programming language.

Holy C:\ language applied using an (human)object-oriented programming style elevates sever-client/peer-to-peer communication to a more abstract level. Although most of the programming ideas used in language-disciplines like FORTRAN, computer C, religion, and civil society are still used in (human)object-oriented programs, the new DIPST concept reorganizes the work.

We hope you will find, as we have, that this new view changes (human)programming from a tedious, albeit engaging, process, to an intellectual enterprise more comparable to the processes we employ in other SITEM and humanist work.

Computers, like human minds, perform complex tasks by executing many simple instructions. Humans specify these instructions by writing programs in a programming language.

Demasio and Demasio, in their article “Brain and Language,” state, “… The cognitive economies of language—its facility for pulling together many concepts under one symbol—make it possible for people to establish ever more complex concepts and use them to think at levels that would otherwise be impossible.

The Holy C:\ programming language provides many mechanisms for expressing abstractions and the relationships among them. The key mechanism for expressing abstractions directly in C:\ language is support for (human)object-oriented programming.

(human)object-oriented programming is characterized by three (3) fundamental ideas: objects, class hierarchies, and poly morphism.

1 An (human)object has state [data] and behavior [functions]. (human)objects combine data that represent state with functions [subroutines] that access or modify the data. If the state of the (human)object=x, then the summation of data, or subject matters=x.

2 Each (human)object is created from a class: a specification of the (human)object’s data and functions. Members of the same class have common function, but separate state.

2.1 Class hierarchies organize classes for work/use/reuse according to application, with classes at the bottom inheriting operations from the classes above [inheritance].

3 Polymorphism allows different kinds of (human)objects that share common behavior to be used in code that only requires that common behavior.

The four (4) benefits of (human)object-oriented programming are:

4 Direct Expression in terms of (human)objects that reduce the gap between concept and program, and facilitate correspondence between physical objects and abstract entities;

5 Malleability in terms of combining data with functions to manipulate that data, facilitating localization of application.

6 Extensibility, via inheritance, allows new (human)objects and their cogb to be defined as incremental modifications and extensions of existing (human)objects.

7 Abstraction in terms of allowing us to write code in terms of the similarities among (human)objects without regard for the differences.

We program on personL(human)computers, workstations(places), mainframes(institutions), and supercomputers(governments). Information Processors are systems programmers who write C:\ compilers.

We move our program between machines, and therefore need an official standard or de facto language definition, being NS DISIS’ Holy C:\ language. C:\ compiler vendors must be commissioned by NS DISIS OPSCOM Central Processing Service.

We need a language that can be compiled into very efficient code when needed. Such code can be sourced from C:\ source code.

We work on many different types of problems in human resource development and we need a general purpose language and systemtheorie. C:\ was designed for this general purpose, not solely for one particular subfield of (human)programming.

We need a language that can interface with (human)operating systems. C:\ can call (human)functions [subroutines] and through them (or in some implementations, directly) cogb subroutines.

Barton and Nackman state, in Scientific and Engineering C++, “To write a program, you must design it; to design a program, you must have written it” (1994, by Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Inc.) [7]. This is the design-versus-implement dilemma, which leads to haphazard growth and implementation of unnecessary code.

(human)object-oriented (mind)software development resolves this dilemma by confronting corrections, modifications, and improvements as fundamental parts of the (human)programming process, essential to producing quality (mind)software.

The underlying function of (human)object-oriented development [using DIPST] is to deconstruct a (mind)software system on the basis of (human)objects [entities characterized by actions; motion; materiality; x] instead of on the basis of functions or data [entities defined by variability; subjectivity; ideality; y], as done in more traditional design methodologies.

The intimate connection between (human)design and (human)programming in (human)object-oriented languages is key to their success; it puts feedback into the design cycle, encouraging the discipline and experimentation that leads to high quality (mind)software. (human)objects allow (human)programs to be designed in the same way that buildings and societies are designed: the overall goal dictates the exact relationship of the members, but the exact specifications of each member depend on the specifications of its neighbors in ways that can be discovered only by iterating again and again through each subsystem.

Barton and Nackman state, “The design and the implementation of successful programs evolve together, each helping the other in incremental steps” [8].

Chairman Mao states, “Discover the truth through practice, and again through practice verify and develop truth. Start from perceptual knowledge and actively develop it into rational knowledge; then start from rational knowledge and actively guide revolutionary practice to change both the subjective and the objective world. Practice, knowledge, again practice, again knowledge. This form repeats itself in endless cycles, and with each cycle the content of practice and knowledge rises to a higher level. Such is the whole of the dialectical-materialist theory of knowledge, and such is the dialectical-materialist theory of the unity of knowing and doing.”

Download Article

(last modified 31 Dec. 19)

EQUITY IMPERATIVE INITIATIVE
FOR
LABOR EQUITY/RIGHT-TO-WORK
AND
CIVIL SOCIETY OPERATIONS (SOCOPS)

1. Leadership, Management, and Workforce Development:
1.1. Running Programs, Workgroups, and Clinical Trials;
1.2. Strategic Workforce Planning and Human Resource Development through workshops and focus groups;

2. Education and Outreach to At-Risk, Underrepresented, Homeless, Traveling, and Displaced Persons;
2.1. Running Programs, Workgroups, and Clinical Trials;
2.2. Community Grain Banking and Dry Good Storage;

3. Policy Development, Recommendation, and Rulemaking:
3.1. Program Compliance and Enforcement;
3.2. Program Review, Evaluation and Assessment;

4. Independent 3rd Party Neutral Ombudsperson:
4.1. Fact-Finding Investigation and Hearing;
4.2. Complaint Processing Representation;
4.3. Conflict Mediation and Facilitation;
4.4. Conflict Prevention and Resolution;
4.5. Prognosis and Proactive Prevention;
4.6. Settlement conference;
4.7. Right-to-Work (lay “Equal Employment Opportunity”) Counseling;

5. Light Marketing:
5.1. Pushing Work in the Community and Light Markets.
#

To Access NS INFOSYSTEMS OS Web-Based Application

Download

(last modified 3 Dec. 2019)

Click to Access infoSystems PROSPECTUS™ user interface.

Mind Software for Human Resource Development ™

Copyright © 2019 by Antarah Crawley. All Rights Reserved.