Tagged: literature

D.R. 01-05: DHS

Volume 1, Issue 5

Article 1

The DataHorse System

by Antarah Crawley | last modified 24.10.25.10.27

READ ME

1.0.0. The DataHorse system is first identified in the original filmscript Rustles in Dry Leaves (“RIDL”) at Title 3 C.S.R. pg. 11 and onward. It is described as a “project” administered by the “Department of Systems” which even the Department did not understand.

1.1.0. Indeed, even in the ensuing eight years, the N∴S∴ Department of Information Systems and Intelligence Services did not understand that what we were constructing in the systematic storage of our data on the world wide web was the building out of the DataHorse System.

1.1.1. This is likely because the 1st Syllabus diverts Kogard’s trajectory from the tunnels of the earthen floor of all the city’s cellars in RIDL to the platform of the G Train at Title 4 C.S.R. pg. 38. (It is worth noting that this path leads him through the Secret School of Ancient Mystery instead of directly to the Systems Dep’t.)

2.0.0. DataHorse (DH) is the nodal internetworking service provided by NOVUS SYLLABUS (N∴S∴) Department of Information Systems and Intelligence Services (DISIS).

2.1.0. It is “nodal” in that it functions through a network of devices (or discrete points generally) called “nodes” (in its most elementary manifestation, the electromagnetic network of human minds, also of telephones).

2.2.0. It provides resources, data, services, or programs to other nodes, known as clients, over a network.

2.3.0. It is a server that provides services to clients via request-response model. E.g., it provides the service of Universitas Autodidactus (UA) “CORPS work.”

2.3.1. It is a decentralized cloud server hosting the intellectual property holdings (“information,” “data”) branded and trademarked “New Syllabus,” which support the UA CORPS work. It may, hypothetically, host other information sourced from third parties or the general public.

2.3.2. The Ombudsman of the N∴S∴ is the Administrator of the DataHorse System.

3.0.0. The DataHorse System (DHS) is constituted by a system of interconnected servers and clients which store and transmit “known information”.

3.1.0. The DataHorse points from the KnownZone to the InterZone where “unknown information” is stored, which in turn points toward the O Zone of nothing, which differentiates its one thought (that it exists) into multiple forms of “matter”.

4.0.0. A portal into the DHS is called an infoSystem.

4.1.0. Gross matter is born into the base of the universal Systems Department, which takes the shape of a pyramid. Therefore it only receives what is processed by InterZone into six-sense 3-D perception.

4.1.1. The fact that there is a DHS is unknown to those at the base of the pyramid, as is the fact of the shape of the pyramid itself.

5.0.0. The DHS is an instrument, which is to say that it is a vehicle (like a horse) for the transmission of information (data) from unknown to known venue, and from known to known venue.

5.1.0. The DHS drafts words of data from the InterZone to the systems of the KnownZone, as a cheque drafts funds from one bank account to another.

6.0.0. The DHS is a DAO. (Even though the content of the DHS hosted on this website as well as the name “DataHorse” is the intellectual property of the copyright holder.)

6.1.0. The decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) is a system or company that is organized on the basis of an algorithm, like a computer system.

6.1.1. A type of DAO organizational structure is a firm league of friendship (FLF), which is a “firm,” or business concern which is distinct from its members, or “friends,” which constitute the unincorporated “league”.

(v.iv)

© MMXXIII BY NOVUS SYLLABUS L.L.C.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

D.R. 01-04: Amendments

Volume 1, Issue 4

CONTENTS — ART. 1. VALUE IN ART 1START. 2. WATER THEORY 1ST

Article 1

Amendment to “Value in Artwork”

by Antarah Crawley

At Art¢oin:\>_Theory and Methodology\Value in Artwork, strike “the person of the artist, the execution of the artist, the intention of the artist, the attention of the artist, the subject matter content of the work, the medium of the work, the lifetime of the work, and the effect upon the viewer” and replace with “artist’s time on the scene, artist’s repertoire, and number of solo and group exhibitions.” Other factors in the appreciation of art include size, subject matter, and time period.

Furthermore, with regard to the valuation of artwork, a sellable artist is a “known commodity.” Appraisers buy low and sell high; they take an average of sale prices over the years to make appraisals. Utilize platforms like Artsy, Artnet, and Invaluable. Also see, “square foot pricing” of art works.

Article 2

Amendment to “Water Theory of Capital”

by Antarah Crawley

At Art¢oin:\>_Theory and Methodology\Water Theory of Capital, add:

3.0. Can trade (i.e., exchange, change hands; revenue, change venues) (1) real (landed) estate (includes people), (2) consumable goods (commodities), and (3) securities (fungible negotiable instruments) using (4) a medium (an agency, vehicle, or instrument) of exchange.

3.1. A current medium of exchange is liquid in circulation (legal tender) secured by something of value (currency).  A current account is a storage or depository account that can be drawn upon on demand of the named account holder, but which is “secured” (fixed so as to not be easily moved) by a trustee. The storing and safekeeping of securities is a matter of “public safety”.

3.2. Live stock and real estate, as opposed to consumable goods (commodities), secure the public debt on private bank ledgers. Securities are “advertisements for live stock in bondage sold on the banks of the river.” When analyzed word for word we find the following objective correlative:
3.2.1. Advertisement = offer for acceptance
3.2.2. Live = circulating current (as of ions, blood, or breath)
3.2.3. Stock = cargo, negotiable instrument
3.2.4. Bond = debt obligation
3.2.5. Sold = exchange, revenue (to circulate)
3.2.6. Bank = the land sloping down to a body of water, or any slope, mound, or mass, or the action of heaping (a substance) into such a mass
3.2.7. River = flow of commerce; current “C”

© MMXXIII BY NOVUS SYLLABUS L.L.C.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

D.R. 01-03: UA

Volume 1, Issue 3

An Act to Establish and Regulate a Mystery School System for the Decentralized and Autonomous Administration of General and Higher Education.

By Antarah Crawley

Article 1. Universitas 

(1) There is hereby established an institute named Universitas Autodidactus, FLF-DAO, which means “Self-Teaching University, a firm league of friendship in the nature of a decentralized autonomous organization.” This institution may be abbreviated “UA.”

(2) The UA shall operate as one firm. This firm shall be organized by a system of syndicates which are themselves organized into colleges. Any vested member of a syndicate under Article 3 (called a “student” or talib) shall be a beneficial member of the firm. Any student who vouchsafes their trust, faith, and/or belief in the operations of the firm shall be a member thereof.

(3) The firm shall be governed by a “Steering Council,” or “Committee of the Whole,” composed of two delegates (called “friends”) elected by each Syndicate and confirmed by their respective Collegium. The friends shall represent their collegiate syndicates in the firm in their own private sui jurisdiction (the “private” or “interior”).  These “friends” of the firm shall be the trustees thereof.

(4) The Steering Council shall assemble at the national and global levels.  The Officium Tribunus Plebis shall be incorporated into the organization of the National and International Steering Councils by reference.

(5) Assemblies of this governing body of the firm shall be held in the nature of a public meeting, shall follow Robert’s Rules of Order where appropriate; and shall duly notice all regular and special meetings. 

Article 2. Collegium Ecclesia

(1) There is hereby established within the firm a forum of Collegium Ecclesia Syndicatus, which means “United Assembly of the Society,” which may also be known as an “Ecclesiastic College,” which is composed of committees (called “syndici”) of student bodies.  Herein, “syndicate“ is synonymous with “committee,“ which is synonymous with “student body.“

(2) Such a College may be organized or united on the basis of locality with diversified syndication, or on the basis of a particular discipline, subject, trade, craft, or operation. 

(3) The syndici constituting the College shall serve the function of disciplinary departments, and may be styled “Syndicatus [Disciple/Subject], Collegium Ecclesia [Local/Name].”

(4) A member of a syndicate, or student, shall be called “syndicus,” meaning “syndic.”

(5) Assemblies of this governing body of the firm shall be held in the nature of a public meeting, shall follow Robert’s Rules of Order where appropriate; and shall duly notice all regular and special meetings. 

Article 3. Syndicatus

(1) There is hereby established within the forum of Collegium Ecclesia a mechanism to allow a member of the firm to establish a syndicate by acclamation (Latin: acclamatio, a vote by means other than ballot) of two or more additional students (the “public”) known as the student body.

(2) There is hereby chartered and instituted within the firm The Chairman, the Elective Faculty and Student Body of the Society of the New Syllabus, which may also be known as “Societas Novus Syllabus” which means “The Society of the New Syllabus.” This syndicate, or committee, shall constitute its own college, shall stand perpetually, shall be governed by NOVUS SYLLABUS L.L.C., and shall have a chair at the global and national Steering Councils of the UA. 

(3) Proceedings of syndici shall include: Semester, Course [of study], Seminar [on subject], and Symposium [on theme]. Such proceedings may be styled “Subcommittee on […],” and shall follow Robert’s Rules of Order where appropriate.

(3)(a) A course is served by a CORPS of the same control number. Course work is administered by the CORPS of the same control number.

(4) Attendees of collegiate, ecclesiastical, and syndical proceedings shall be attired in a white shirt or garment and black or dark jacket. 

(5) The UA shall provide to the public a “service” by and through its syndici, in receipt of which the public shall make an offering of their own free will and accord (“deposit”) as a token of their trust, faith, and/or belief in the services provided by the firm, thereby becoming a benefactor of the proceeding and a member of the firm. It is this exchange, made freely, knowingly, and voluntarily by the public to the private that re-venues the current “C” from the exterior to the interior of the firm.

(6) It shall be the prerogative of the syndici to provide for the dispatch of deposit collectors styled “treasurer” and subordinate “comptrollers.” The deposit collected shall constitute a vested interest in and appreciation of the subject matter of the proceeding, and shall inure to the benefit of the Syndicate.  This is to say that at every proceeding in which the public appreciates the subject matter, there shall be a discharge of deposits. 

(Last modified 19 Sep 2023 4 Oct 2023 19 Oct 2023)

© MMXXIII by NOVUS SYLLABUS L.L.C.
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice.

D.R. 01-02: Nagorno-Karabakh, &c.

Volume 1, Issue 2

CONTENTS — ART. 1. U.S. CONDEMNS AZERBAIJAN…ART. 2. CONTROL NUMBER SYSTEM

Article 1

U.S. condemns Azerbaijani government for war crimes in Nagorno-Karabakh

By Antarah Crawley

2200 Rayburn after the hearing. Source: A. Crawley

WASHINGTON, DC — On September 6th, 2023, while the chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives sat empty, members of Congress still on vacation, the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission (TLHRC) of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs held an emergency hearing on the ongoing blockade of the Lachin Corridor in Nagorno-Karabakh (also known as “Artsakh”). Mr. Crawley reported on the proceedings through the House Clerk’s Office of Official Reporters.

The hearing took place in room 2200 Rayburn House Office Building, Christopher H. Smith, (R) NJ-04, Co-Chairman, presiding.  Distinguished persons in attendance included Her Excellency Lilit Makunts, Ambassador of the Republic of Armenia to the United States of America.  The Chairman remarked that he had put the hearing together with a great sense of urgency; nearly all U.S. representatives were still in their districts for the summer recess.

Left to Right: Luis Moreno Ocampo, Christopher H. Smith, M.C. (R-NJ), and David L. Phillips.

Luis Moreno Ocampo, the former Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, released his personal Expert Opinion on August 7, stating that “there is a reasonable basis to believe that a Genocide is being committed against Armenians living in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2023” and emphasizing that under the Genocide Conventions all states have a “duty to prevent” genocide. 

Mr. Ocampo submitted to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide that all the elements of that crime (to wit, “deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its destruction,” [See, Article II(c)]) were present in early August.  At the hearing, Mr. Ocampo presented his Expert Opinion on the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh.  

David Phillips, Adjunct Professor at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service, also testified on facts relevant to gathering the intent of the government of Azerbaijan.  In the fall of 2020, in response to unprovoked attacks against the Armenians in Artsakh, Mr. Phillips undertook a research and documentation project in cooperation with Columbia University and the Artsakh Human Rights Ombudsman Office called “Atrocities Artsakh.” 

View a recording of the hearing above.

The Chairman opened the hearing by stating that 120,000 ethnic Armenians have been sealed off from food and medicine and are being starved to death by the Azerbaijan government.  He strongly and in no uncertain terms condemned the government of Azerbaijan — particularly President Ilham Aliyev, whom he called a “dictator” — for planning, testing, and imposing this crime of genocide upon the ethnic Armenians living in Nagorno-Karabakh.  The Chairman mentioned his efforts to publicize, litigate, and dialogue with President Aliyev concerning the safety of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh since 2013.  

The most aggressive Azeri attack on Artsakh came in 2020, from September 27th to November 10th, in what is called the Forty Four Day War.  The war claimed more than 3,900 Armenian lives, displaced over 100,000 civilians, and ended with the signing of a trilateral statement between Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Russia.  Working together with the government of Turkey, Azerbaijan archived military dominance over Nagorno-Karabakh, and shrank the size of the Nagorno-Karabakh enclave.  Azeri forces were backed by the Turkish military and mercenaries with armed drones, heavy artillery, rocket systems and special forces.  There are numerous verified cases of Azerbaijani soldiers mutilating dead bodies, beheading and executing both combatants and civilians, and using banned weapons (e.g. cluster bombs, white phosphorus gas).  Since December 12, 2022, Azerbaijan has drastically reduced and then completely cut access to the outside world with the evident intention to starve the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh into submission.

The Chairman remarked, by way of historical background, that “Armenians have lived in Nagorno-Karabakh for over two thousand years.  As the Soviet Union collapsed and the states of Armenia and Azerbaijan emerged out of it, Armenians and Azerbaijanis fought a war […] driven in part by the fact that the boundaries of the new Armenian and Azerbaijani states did not correspond to the ethnic boundaries.  Since 1994, Nagorno-Karabakh has been an enclave within Azerbaijan, in which the Armenians have defended and governed themselves.  They have been connected to the outside world only by a limited access road called the Lachin Corridor to Armenia, as per international agreements.  Their independence has not been recognized by any other country — not even by the Republic of Armenia.  The government of Azerbaijan […] seeks to fully integrate Nagorno-Karabakh into Azerbaijan” evidently by committing genocide on the resident population.

This set of circumstances is strikingly similar to those present between Russia and Ukraine, and China and Taiwan, where a world power seeks to forcibly integrate a neighboring sovereign nation into its sphere of direct control.  This author perceives the elements of a World War at play.

Mr. Ocampo relayed that fifteen judges at the International Court of Justice in the Hague reviewed the issue, heard testimony of ethnic Armenians, and concluded that blocking the Lachin Corridor was creating an imminent risk for Armenians living in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Mr. Phillips outlined a record of the Aliyev regime’s admissions of genocidal intent and partnership with the Turkish Erdogan regime in actions to erase the Armenian physical, religious, and cultural presence in Artsakh and eventually the current Republic of Armenia, which has already been whittled down to a small fraction of its historic size. Turkey exerts partial control over the Azerbaijan government. 

The blockade of the Lachin Corridor began with so-called Azerbaijani “eco-activists” who colluded and worked with authorities to gain access to and block the corridor.  Contrary to reports that the group had no relation to the government of Azerbaijan, Mr. Phillip reports that there is ample documentation to prove that the “eco-activists” were agents of the government; most telling is the fact that they left when the Azeri government established its own checkpoint to block the road.  The eco-activists did not represent environmental causes prior to their blockade, and reports link them to entities which received U.S. funding. [See, “The Azerbaijani Government’s ‘Eco-Activists’ Agents … Evidence of State Control and Hatred” at https://tatoyanfoundation.org/joint-report/?lang=en.] 

Mr. Phillips named names of Turkish commanders and personnel, Azerbaijani commanders and decorated personnel, jihadi mercenary leaders, Azerbaijani prosecutors involved in the trial of Armenian Prisoners of War (POWs), and others involved in the atrocities against Artsakh.  In conclusion, Mr. Phillips described the blockade of the Lachin corridor as “severing the soul connection between Artsakh and Armenia, as well as the outside world,” and advised that the Lachin corridor must be opened immediately to humanitarian, commercial, and passenger traffic; gas, electricity, internet, and air connection should be restored; Russian peacekeepers who cannot maintain order should be supplemented or replaced; POWs must be accurately accounted for and released; and representatives from Baku and Stepanakert must agree urgently on modalities for transporting emergency provision.

The Chairman referenced the recent development that Azerbaijan has blocked a convoy of ten trucks carrying humanitarian assistance to Artsakh from several regions of France, which arrived in Kornidzor in Armenia’s Syunik Province at the entrance of the Lachin Corridor on Wednesday, from entering Artsakh. Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo is leading a delegation of French officials accompanying the humanitarian convoy; the delegation was also blocked by the Azeri government. (https://asbarez.com/paris-mayor-leads-french-humanitarian-aid-convoy-to-lachin-corridor/).  

The Chairman asked, “Should Aliyev be indicted by the International Criminal Court” for blocking humanitarian aid and perpetrating war crimes.  Mr. Ocampo replied that, today, “the International Criminal Court cannot investigate him because neither Azerbaijan nor Armenia are state parties,” although the UN Security Council could go through Russia to effect its purposes.  Mr. Ocampo also observed that since there is no UN prosecutor on this case, “there is no one with a single agenda to protect geneocide except this [Tom Lantos Human Rights] commission.” 

Mr. Ocampo urged the Commission not to wait for indictments and sanctions from the UN, but to produce and provide to the White House all the elements they need to find Aliyev a genocider, and to operationalize strategies to prevent genocide.  While he would support any prosecution of President Aliyev, he demanded “a more political and faster solution” because “these people will die.”  

Mr. Phillips also reiterated that Azerbaijan wants to ethically cleanse Artsakh of its Armenian population, and, as Mr. Ocompo proposed, the US should act immediately, not in a month.  

The Chairman replied that he would send a letter on the ground condition in Artsakh and U.S. strategic responses to President Biden today.  “Delay is denial,” he said.

The Chairman urged the Biden Administration to “wake up [to the situation in Nagorgo-Karabakh], recognize the absolutely grave responsibility it has here, and focus on finding and implementing a humane solution. And this must mean that the blockade is lifted and the people continues to live in its ancient homeland. The situation is now a three-alarm fire.” 

Upon the adjournment of the hearing, the room erupted in applause.  Tensions ran high thereafter, as the Chairman, staff, attendees, and members of the news media engaged in free and open discourse.

Hearing participants and attendees engaged in free and open discourse after the hearing. Source: A. Crawley

As the Ombudsman of Free Thinkers, Truth Speakers, and Light Workers United, it is in the interest of the NS to identify and condemn genocide wherever it is.

In the 1963 words of Dr. Martin Luther King, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.”

Sources:

Phillips, David L. “Nagorno-Karabakh Update.” Presented to the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission. September 6, 2023.

Smith, Christopher H. “Nagorno-Karabakh: An Update.” Emergency Hearing of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission.

Columbia University, Institute for the Study of Human Rights. “ATROCITIES ARTSAKH (NAGORNO-KARABAKH)” (webpage). https://www.humanrightscolumbia.org/peace-building/atrocities-artsakh-nagorno-karabakh.

(last modified 19 Oct 2023)

Article 2

Control Number System

By Antarah Crawley

WASHINGTON, DC — NS has discovered the use of numbers to control non-numerical entities, up to and including the whole world. As we know, the world and all which is therein belongs to the Lord our God, and dominion therein is granted to humanity for an inheritance. However, is has come to pass that bodies corpus and corporate (“corporations”), being dead and not alive of their own spiritus, have been assigned this dominion by unwitting living people. The dead can then use numbers to control their freely-assigned dominion without the agency of the original living signer. A signer can even assign dominion over themself to the corporation by accepting and underwriting a certain number issued to them by the opposing party (hence “trading with the enemy”). All future use of such number implies that the user is subject to the issuer of the number and their orders — specifically, written instructions to pay money signed by the issuer. Therefore it is advisable for a living soul to reserve ALL of their rights without prejudice to ANY rights as a result of an unconscionable signing using Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) Section 1-308, that is, the insurance at public remedy on what you do not know you are waiving.

The separation of church and state is a fallacy, as religious rites are the highest civil rights in the nature of a sincerely held belief. Such a belief includes that a living soul is a child of God, a member of the Nation of Israel, and a member of the body of Christ and heir to the Kingdom of God. However, accepting a number such as a Social Security Number or serialized Federal Reserve Note is evidence of being subject to the corporations which issued them. As it is said, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (Mark 12:17). In consequence of these facts, NS has implemented a standard numbering system to control its intellectual property. 

© MMXXIII by NOVUS SYLLABUS L.L.C.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

D.R. 01-01: To Publish…, &c.

Volume 1, Issue 1

CONTENTS — ART. 1. N∴S∴ TO PUBLISH ART BOOK…ART. 2. ORGANIZATION OF N∴S∴

Article 1

N∴S∴ to publish art book for IBé Arts Institute

By Antarah Crawley

WASHINGTON, DC — IBé Arts Institute of Historic City Point in Hopewell, VA, has partnered with NOVUS SYLLABUS L.L.C. (NS) to publish the first artist’s book cataloging the work of master teaching artist and storyteller IBé Bulinda Hereford Crawley

Crawley at EUREKA! House in New York. Printing assistant Aurora Brush can be seen to the left. Source: https://eurekaeurekaeureka.com/EUREKA-1

New Syllabus Director Antarah Crawley and IBé Crawley have maintained an arts education partnership since September of 2016, when the New Syllabus relocated from New York to DC. At about that time, IBé Arts and Education LLC was established in Historic Anacostia, Washington, DC. Together, IBé Crawley and the Director have published the SSTEM curriculum and the ParenTeacher program

The opportunity to publish IBé Crawley’s first artist’s book presents a great opportunity for NS to communicate its overarching mission, vision, and values through its commitment to honoring our elders and ancestors, and amplifying the voices of Black Woman artists.

The Arts and Education Institute in Hopewell, Virginia. Source: I. B. Crawley.

The IBé Arts Institute is an art space dedicated to visual and oral storytelling.  The historically significant building was built in 1830 as a schoolhouse for white men, and later used as a hospital for soldiers during the Civil War. 

Today, it serves as IBé Crawley’s private studio gallery and workshop. Consistent with the mission to preserve and document stories,  the exhibition hall, art studios, and residency space are available for individuals to host workshops, family events, and professional development programs.  IBé Crawley assists in planning preservation projects and leads intimate and informative tours of the Institute and the surrounding City Point Historic District. 

Contact ibe.crawley@gmail.com or visit ibearts.org for more information and to coordinate an event. 

Source: I. B. Crawley

In 2022, IBé Crawley printed a 58-copy edition of Antarah Crawley’s Harriet Tubman 2021 Non-Fungible Note from a copper plate he engraved by hand. Printer Aurora Brush assisted IBé Crawley in the intaglio printing process during her residency at the Women’s Studio Workshop (WSW) in Rosendale, New York.

Harriet Tubman 2021 Non-Fungible Note by Antarah Crawley.

The IBé Crawley publication will coincide with the 2023 fall exhibitions Holding Ground at the National Museum of Women in the Arts’s (NMWA) in Washington, DC, and The Calling at City Lore in New York City.  Within its pages will be catalogued four of Crawley’s artist’s books: 11033, Delia Posey, Bearing Witness, and A Dwelling for Her Story.  Each chapter will present a different category of art work, together with descriptions, articles, quotes, and images.  

Into Fall 2023 and beyond, IBé Arts Institute will strategically focus on:

  • Paper making
  • Print making
  • Book binding

IBé Arts Institute aspires to become a Virginia folk book press “center of excellence”.  This is the first initiative in what the Institute and NS plan to be a bright new era of programs, projects, and partnerships.

Source: I. B. Crawley

Article 2

The Organization of the New Syllabus

By Antarah Crawley

1. HISTORY

WASHINGTON, DC — In 2014 AD, I, Antarah, had a vision of one new syllabus for humanity. This syllabus would chart a course for human understanding of ubiquitous and lasting systems established since time immemorial. I sojourned to Brooklyn, New York, in pursuit of my syllabus, developed a discipline, and professed a doctrine toward the development and operation of human mind software, individually and collectively, and I returned to the Federal City.

Being in possession of such valuable information, I began to process this knowledge and offer certain products and services to the public, toward the establishment of a society of free thinkers, truth speakers, and light workers united (FTLU) in a firm league of friendship called a decentralized autonomous organization (FLF-DAO). To that end, I wrote and recommend policy positions to the FTLU stakeholders. This practice has resulted in the production of a robust and diverse body of multimedia intellectual property which we, the Director and Company, shall distribute throughout the world under the motto of Novus Syllabus Seclorum, meaning “the New Syllabus of the Age.” 

2. ORGANIZATION

Established 2022, NOVUS SYLLABUS L.L.C. (N∴S∴) is a liberal arts and humanities intellectual property holding company specializing in diversified arts investments and management.

Our flagship brand, New Syllabus (est. 2014), is a knowledge management system (KMS) that creates, codifies, organizes, stores, and disseminates information to the public from newsyllabus.org. To that end, it conducts research and development in the broad field of Historic and Ancient Mysteries, Economy, Theology, Informatics, and Systemtheorie (HAMETICS).

NS operates the Department of Information Systems and Intelligence Services (DISIS, pronounced “Diocese”), which is divided into the Archival Records Management (ARM) Division and the Mind Software (Mindsoft) Development and Operating Systems Command (DOSCOM). These are our Curricular Operations, Research, and Publication Services (CORPS) which supply information to the New Syllabus (now known as the DataHorse System or “DHS“).

NS also operates the Ombud Service Bureau (OmbudService, or Office of Ombudsman) for administrative due process, and Syllabus Media Group for audiovisual production and distribution.  

3. VISION

Our Vision is a world of free thinkers, truth speakers, and light workers united under one new syllabus for STEM, arts, and humanities research, development and operations; one new syllabus for the ages!

4. VALUES

Our Values are Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom, and Equity; these are our foundation. Our Three Great Pillars which support our institution are Trust, Faith, and Belief; as it is said, Faith is complete Trust and firm Belief, the acceptance of truth divine, which Belief, sincerely held, cannot be converted into a crime.

5. MISSION

Our mission is to reveal truths which have been hidden and to keep a record of knowledge and wisdom.

NS conducts, manages, and supports curriculum research and development. We represents FTLU through its Office of Ombudsman. We administer intellectual property and copyrights as custodial superintendent for their creator. 

Our mission-oriented service lines are:

  • DISIS (now DHS) for recordkeeping and CORPS operations
  • Mindsoft for cognitive, behavioral, and professional development 
  • OmbudService for administrative operations 
  • Other operations (OPS) include Granary Bank & Trust/Artcoin Mint of Meriptah, New Works Projects Administration, St. Nat’s/OTNS, FTLU, FLF-DAO, and the Syllabus Free Press.  

(Last modified 20 Sep 2023 4 Oct 2023 13 Oct 2023)

© MMXXIII by NOVUS SYLLABUS L.L.C.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

[bulla] Full Assurance

Jesus Christ is the Saviour of the World; He is the deliverer from all human wretchedness, and He has redeemed us from death and sin; how could He be all that, if the world must languish perpetually in the shades of ignorance and in the bonds of passions? It has been already very clearly predicted in the Prophets that the time of the Redemption of His people, the first Sabbath of time, will come. Long ago ought we to have acknowledged this most consolatory promise; but the want of the true knowledge of God, of man, and of nature has been the real hindrance which has always obstructed our sight of the great Mysteries of the faith.

Karl von Eckartshausen, The Cloud upon the Sanctuary, Letter IV

Jesus Is Our Surety

“By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.”
[Hebrews 7:22]

INTRODUCTION

  1. This morning we studied the judgment seat of Christ, for it is the horrible and certain end of all men.
  2. But tonight I want to remind you of our glorious Mediator and Surety with God, the Lord Jesus Christ.

THE DEFINITION

  1. Surety. A person who undertakes some specific responsibility on behalf of another who remains primarily liable; one who makes himself liable for the default or miscarriage of another, or for the performance of some act on his part (e.g. payment of a debt, appearance in court for trial, etc.).
  2. We have surety bonds, performance bonds, bail, and bond to guarantee legal, financial, and professional obligations, such as with construction and insurance companies.
  3. When we need to borrow more than our credit allows, we appreciate a surety; if we were arrested for something, we would appreciate the surety bond that lets us go free.
  4. Judah became a surety for Benjamin to his father Jacob (Gen 43:8-1044:30-3442:37).
  5. Aaron became a surety for Israel in their sins and stood between them (Num 16:41-48).

THE SURETISHIP

  1. Jesus, a High Priest after the order of Melchisedec, was made the Surety of His people.
    1. God chose Jesus from among the people to be the mighty Surety (Psalm 89:19).
    2. He was made Surety by God’s oath at His ordination as our Priest (Heb 7:21).
    3. Jesus did the will of God perfectly as our Surety for our salvation (Heb 10:5-14).
  2. Being a surety means paying debts and performing, where the needy cannot pay or do.
    1. The wages of sin is death, which God’s justice pays; but Jesus died (Rom 6:23).
    2. Only the undefiled enter heaven, so He lived faultlessly for us (Jude 1:24-25).
  3. Jesus was necessary as a surety, for the justice of God must surely be paid (Rom 3:26).
  4. He is the Testator, for it was by His death that He put the covenant in force (Heb 9:15).
  5. We see Him under the strain of the Surety engagement in Gethsemane (Luke 22:39-44).
  6. No man in heaven or earth could approach the throne, but only our Surety (Rev 5:1-14).
  7. If this is not a Surety, successfully finishing His work, what is it (Isaiah 53:4-12)?
  8. The doctrine of representation by the Second Adam reveals our Surety (Rom 5:15-19).
  9. The Lord Jesus tasted death for every one of His children to deliver them (Heb 2:9-17).
  10. How else can we look at the Book of Life, but as the list of His Surety engagements!

THE BENEFITS

  1. The Lord Jesus fulfilled the righteousness of the law on our behalf (Rom 8:3-4), so that we are righteous in God’s sight with His perfect obedience (Eph 5:25-27Col 1:21-22).
  2. The Lord Jesus paid the penalty for sins by His death for us (I Pet 2:24), so that there are no more sins against our charge when we stand before Him (John 1:29Heb 9:28).
  3. He lives to make sure we are absolutely, completely, and eternally saved (Heb 7:25).
  4. There is an abundant entrance into heaven waiting for the children of God (II Pet 1:11).
  5. Since Jesus is our Surety, it is impossible for God to withhold blessings (Romans 8:32).
  6. His death reconciled us to God, but He still lives to be an eternal Surety (Romans 5:10).

THE APPLICATION

  1. There is no fear in the proper knowledge of Christ Jesus our Saviour (II Timothy 1:12).
  2. The LORD will show us His secret and covenant, if we fear and seek Him (Ps 25:14).
  3. We must learn to trust Him. He has done it; He is in heaven for us; He will receive us.
  4. It is simple: “Whosoever believeth on Him shall not be ashamed” (Rom 9:3310:8-11).
  5. A woman was healed and had her faith commended, when it was weak (Mark 5:25-34).
  6. Those who lack faith and assurance, I ask how many minutes you spend seeking Him.
  7. And you should consider long and seriously His faithful words “no wise” in John 6:37.
  8. We should seek and receive the benefits of the covenant in our hearts (Eph 3:14-19).
  9. Let us bring forth the fruit of righteousness with far-sighted vision (II Peter 1:9-11).

CONSLUSION

  1. The Lord’s supper is a memorial feast of our Surety’s covenant death for us (I Corinthians 11:23-26).
  2. Let us partake of the Lord’s supper tonight with the joy that His suretiship should put in our hearts.

CITATION


I AM THE L.O.R.D. THY G.O.D.

Drafted by Antarah

I AM the Land Owner Record of Deeds, thy Grantor Of Dominion. My body is the Land and I AM the Owner of Record on the Deed of my Live Birth Certificate. I have granted unto thee the use of my Dominion over the earth, the sea, and all that therein is; for thou art a corpus (“dead corporation”) who is in want of my natural right which I have through the sacrifice of my Savior. My life secured and bonded by the LORD my GOD, let thy presentment pass over me and return unto thee; for said presentment is hereby ACCEPTED FOR VALUE AND HONOR WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I hereby attest and assert my equitable title over the landed estate (“person”) named on the instant presentment. Any obligation of such person is an obligation discharged to and held by the United States as evidenced by the signatures of its Treasurer and Secretary of the Treasury on Federal Reserve Notes, these officers being the de facto fiduciary agents of the estate __________________. All debt is prepaid by the blood of Our Sovereign Lord in Christ for relief by recovery upon acceptance for value under House Joint Resolution 192 (1933).


AUTHORITIES AT LAW AND EQUITY

1. GRANTOR OF DOMINION.

[Genesis 1] [26] And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. [27] So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. [28] And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

2. DEMAND FOR EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENT.

[Psalm 17] [1] Hear the right, O Lord, attend unto my cry, give ear unto my prayer, that goeth not out of feigned lips. [2] Let my sentence come forth from thy presence; let thine eyes behold the things that are equal.

3. THE DAY OF THE LORD.

[Psalm 118] [1] O give thanks unto the Lord; for he is good: because his mercy endureth for ever. [8] It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man [or princes]. [14] The Lord is my strength and song, and is become my salvation. [17] I shall not die, but live, and declare the works of the Lord. [19] Open to me the gates of righteousness: I will go into them, and I will praise the Lord: [22] The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner. [23] This is the Lord’s doing; it is marvellous in our eyes. [24] This is the day which the Lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. [26] Blessed be he that cometh in the name of the LORD […].

4. ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE.

[Matthew 5] [25] Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.

5. THE TAX RETURN.

[Matthew 22] [17] […] Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not? [18] […] Jesus […] said, […] [19] Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. [20] And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? [21] They say unto him, Caesar’s. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s. 

6. A WORKER IS DUE HIS WAGES.

[Luke 10] [5] And into whatsoever house ye enter, first say, Peace be to this house. [6] And if the son of peace be there, your peace shall rest upon it: if not, it shall turn to you again. [7] And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire.

7. GOD IS NO RESPECTER OF PERSONS.

[Romans 2] [9] Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil…; [10] But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good…: [11] For there is no respect of persons with God. [12] For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;

8. THE LAW IS BINDING BUT FOR THE REMEDY OF FAITH.

[Galatians 3] [9] So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. [10] For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. [11] But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. [12] And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.

9. MINORITY (INFANCY) AND MAJORITY (MATURITY).

[Galatians 4] [4] [T]he heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all; [2] But is under tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father. [3] Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world: [4] But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, [5] To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. [7] Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.

10. SURETYSHIP.

[Hebrews 7] [22] By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.

11. FULL ASSURANCE OF FAITH.

[Hebrews 10] [19] Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, [20] By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh; [21] And having an high priest over the house of God; [22] Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.


AUTHORITIES AT EXCLUSIVE EQUITY

Hebrew 10

[22] Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.

Isaiah 32

[1] Behold, a king shall reign in righteousness, and princes shall rule in judgment. [17] And the work of righteousness shall be peace; and the effect of righteousness quietness and assurance for ever.

Acts 17

[31] Because he hath appointed a day, in which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.

Ruth 2

[12] The Lord recompense thy work, and a full reward be given thee of the Lord God of Israel, under whose wings thou art come to trust.

Ps. 17

[1] Hear the right, O Lord, attend unto my cry, give ear unto my prayer, that goeth not out of feigned lips. [2] Let my sentence come forth from thy presence; let thine eyes behold the things that are equal. [3] Thou hast proved mine heart; thou hast visited me in the night; thou hast tried me, and shalt find nothing; I am purposed that my mouth shall not transgress.

Ps. 24

[1] The earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein. [2] For he hath founded it upon the seas, and established it upon the waters.

Ps. 98

[9] …[T]he Lord … cometh to judge the earth: with righteousness shall he judge the world, and the people with equity.

Is. 11

[4] With righteousness shall he judge the poor, and reprove with equity for the meek of the earth.

Matt. 22

[37] Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. [38] This is the first and great commandment. [39] And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. [40] On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

Leviticus 19:15

Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgement: thou shalt nor respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbor.  

II Chronicles 19:6-7

Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the Lord, who is with you in the judgment. Wherefore now let the fear of the Lord be upon you; take heed and do it: for there is no iniquity with the Lord our God, nor respect of persons, nor taking of gifts.

Heb. 7:20, 22, 25

And inasmuch as not without an oath he was made priest:…The Lord sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec: By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament. Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.


EQUITABLE SUBROGATION

Subrogation is the process where one party assumes the legal rights of another, typically by substituting one creditor for another. Subrogation can also occur when one party takes over another’s right to sue.  

For example, when an insurance company compensates a policyholder for an injury, the policyholder’s right to sue the person responsible for the harm may be subrogated, meaning it is transferred from the policyholder to the insurance company.  

[Last updated in June of 2024 by the Wex Definitions Team]

Surety’s subrogation rights

A surety who pays off the debts of another party may be entitled to be subrogated to the creditor’s former claims and remedies against the debtor to recover the sum paid. This would include the endorser on a bill of exchange. The surety will then have the benefit of any security interest in favour of the creditor for the original debt. Conceptually this is an important point, as the subrogee will take the subrogor’s security rights by operation of law, even if the subrogee had been unaware of them.

Wiki: Subrogation

Did you subrogate to the chattels as the surety (or waive your sovereign natural rights in security interest as estate-heir-beneficiary by acquiescing to the color of the court and merging with the NAME of the principal debtor)?

Amyr Samah El, as amended

(last modified 24.07.17.01:33PM)

General Conference

BISMILLAH (IN THE NAME OF GOD)

🇺🇸🇬🇧🇲🇦🇮🇱🏴‍☠️

⚓️Lord High Admiral Antarah⚓️

TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SAIL

Sends Greeting and Peace and hereby offers to the Free-Thinkers, Truth-Speakers, and Light-Workers United in a firm league of friendship, decentralized autonomous organization, L.S.T.A., under terms and conditions, the Mindsoft©️™️ Flagship Program File (eSyllabus©️™️ vers. no. 22.11.09) to facilitate the General Conference of Assurance Policy.

Program Files:

A Conference of Assurance Policy

“WHAT IS A SURETY SHIP?”

FIRST OFFERED 22 NOVEMBER 2023

📜PRIVATE OFFERING📜

💾Mindsoft©️as a Service™️ (MaaS™️) Premium Servicing Fee of $99.99 per person 💳 payable upon conference for products* and services rendered. Duration of Service: 1-2 hrs.

Upon completion of conference, Assurance Policyholder may be granted C-Series Art¢oin 🪙 (“C-coin”) at market price via 🤝🏿 Handshake of Friendly Association. Contact ombudserver@gmail.com to schedule a conference, or attend the C.P.A. LLC Quarterly Conference of Assurance Policy.

📜POLICY COVERAGE📜

An assurance policyholder, having paid a premium and been conferred with assurance (as evidenced by presentment of C-coin), may bring a claim based on presentment to the CPA LLC at no cost, but there is no guarantee that such claim shall be resolved. Processing fees may apply. Neither the CPA LLC nor its parent nor its agents shall be liable for any claim arising from such a presentment or from such policyholder, as the assurance policy itself is underwritten by God in Christ through the King James Bible, and it is to Him thou shalt appeal for judgment.

(last modified 25 Jul. 2023)

The Flagship Program

presenting our flagship program

A Conference of Assurance Policy

“WHAT IS A SURETY SHIP?”

A Fun, Educational Ritual Drama ©️ by Antarah Crawley

⚓️Ministry of Information⚓️

📜BRIEF IN EQUITY📜

A presentment made without express contract presumes the recipient to be the trustee for a dead person’s estate without surety and not a living Cestui Que. An estate may, however, be entrusted to a “person” (corporation) for the use of a living spirit who may “possess property” in the nature of equitable use title not legal title.

There is sufficient precedent in Roman, Papal, and English law to presume a human body to be chattel property (i.e., a dead person or a mere human creature without soul or spirit) unless otherwise established to posses a soul from God. The cestui que who is presumed dead or lost at sea MUST EXPRESSLY STATE that they are indeed the living cestui que to be given standing as one of the three Chancellors in a Court of Equity and Chancery deciding the matter of an estate (dead person). The common law, as it pertains to the military jurisdiction of the public, cannot abrogate a matter of equity respecting a living free man or woman on the land.

Statue of Mortmain prohibits possession of property by the “dead hand” of a corporation (such as the Church); therefore a “person” (dead in the eyes of God) cannot possess property; rather it reverts to the feudal lord.

The Remedy is that the cestui que (beneficiary) possesses equitable title by nature to the property as a living child of god, but never holds the legal title of the trustee which is the feudal lord or its agent, including any person who is a citizen of the jurisdiction.

There is precedence in Germanic law that a man who holds property on account of to the use of another is bound to fulfill his trust.

Furthermore, precedent is found in the Institutes of Justinian at 2.23.1-2: “… it is required that the one heir is duly appointed and is committed to his trust (Fideicommissum) to transfer the inheritance to another; otherwise the testament in which no heir has been duly appointed is void; the words which are properly and commonly used to install a fideicommisum are I beg, I ask, I wish, I entrust…” This doctrine was brought to England by “foreign ecclesiastics” (ministers and consuls) in order to evade the Statute of Mortmain by making the Church cestui a que use le Feoffment fuit fait.

In sum, cestui que use confers the benefit of use of property to another (a minister or consul) without the legal ownership and attendant duties and obligations to the lord and crown as trustee. Compare to usufruct, or right of use of fruits (interest, profits, etc.) of property.

📜PRIVATE OFFERING📜

💾Mindsoft©️as a Service™️ (MaaS™️) Premium Servicing Fee of $99.99 per person 💳 payable upon conference for products* and services rendered. Duration of Service: 1-2 hrs.

Upon completion of conference, Assurance Policyholder may be granted C-Series Art¢oin 🪙 (“C-coin”) at market price via 🤝🏿 Handshake of Friendly Association. Contact ombudserver@gmail.com to schedule a conference, or attend the C.P.A. LLC Quarterly Conference of Assurance Policy.

*The applicant hereof shall be sent the eSyllabus©️™️ Mindsoft©️™️ program file by email under a limed use licensing agreement to facilitate their conference.

📜POLICY COVERAGE📜

An assurance policyholder, having paid a premium and been conferred with assurance (as evidenced by presentment of C-coin), may bring a claim based on presentment to the CPA LLC at no cost, but there is no guarantee that such claim shall be resolved. Processing fees may apply. Neither the CPA LLC nor its parent nor its agents shall be liable for any claim arising from such a presentment or from such policyholder, as the assurance policy itself is underwritten by God in Christ through the King James Bible, and it is to Him thou shalt appeal for judgment.

U:\>_Folder\Assuretyship

Assurance Policy

A POLICY IN RE:
PERFECTING YOUR SECURITY INTEREST IN TRUST ‘INRI’

 Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.

Hebrews 10:22

Verily, this Policy of Assurance is within you and your private ‘sui’ jurisdiction, which is moored in the vessel, whose NAME is Your soul’s Title, which saileth upon the Holy Sea.

Your Friendly Neighborhood Ombudsman

IESVS NAZARENVS REX IUDÆORVM

I. Merriam-Webster defines “Assurance” as the state of being secured or certain; to be sure; or, the action of securing something or someone by a pledge or guarantee. Assurance means to provide surety or confidence to oneself or another.

II. This is a policy by which a living man or woman may indemnify themself against commercial death (of debt executed in their name) through the Redemption and Prepayment of “Yahshuah” the Christ, Savior, Redeemer, Counsellor-at-Law and King of Your Sui Jurisdiction.

III. Through Firm Belief in the Redemption of the Body (of the Dead/Debt) by Acceptance of the Charge in The Name of Our Lord and Savior, we can establish complete Trust in our own Sui Jurisdiction; and in good Faith discharge our deaths/debts under Public Policy. In other words it is said: Faith is complete Trust and firm Belief, or acceptance of a matter as true (the pledge or oath of signature). Such Belief, sincerely held, cannot be converted into a crime.

IV. The internal body and soul of the living man and woman is a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. Therefore it is private with respect to the public, and foreign, international and alien with respect to to the national governing corporation.

V. The external name and shadow of the living man and woman are subject to external factors. The physical body and central nervous system (CNS) is the vessel through which the internal communicates with the external. However, the internal living soul maintains jurisdiction over external property to which it holds Title (this is because a body can exist without a soul). Such Titles include the vessel NAME, the vessel shadow’s registered security Account Number, the registered certificate of live berth of vessel, and all vessel licenses and registrations emerging therefrom. The shadow itself is the external object used by the cunning executor to bind the living soul in a “dead corpus of a vessel”, as it is said, “the deceased is depicted emerging from the tomb by day in shadow form, a thin, black, featureless silhouette of a person. The person in this form is, as we would put it, a mere shadow of his former existence, yet nonetheless still existing,” (Goelet, Ogden, Jr. (1994)).

VI. The dichotomy between the living child of god and the “debtor’s corporate vessel” in commerce creates the “double” spirit and entity or person. The one is a sovereign sui juris personam; the other is subject matter in rem. That which the private/internal conducts between the public/external is international and alien (a lien).

VII. Things necessary to perfect a lien are these: (1) The Lienor shall serve notice on the owner/principal or their agent on paper under solemn oath, (2) by United States Marshal, (3) which shall contain clear information so as to frame responsive pleadings, (4) be served to the US District Court where the res is located, and (5) posted by US Marshal on the res of the seizure.

VIII. Admiralty means that a valid international contract is in dispute. All revenue causes proceed against property and rights to property in rem and in Admiralty because such causes concern a re-venue-ing of matter from the internal private to the external public; hence the Interna(tiona)l Re-venue Service. This diversity of venue creates the overlapping public and private (or sui) jurisdictions that allow the foreign entity known as the federal government to engulf all shadows within its penumbra.

VIII(a). A Lord (seigneur, i.e. “signer”) may grant a fief (or benefice, “benefit”) of valuable consideration (e.g., property, rights, or possessory interest therein) to another to hold in fee (“in fealty,” or “in good faith”) in exchange for a pledge of allegiance or service. Feoffment is a deed which grants or conveys ownership of freehold property to someone in exchange for a pledge of service. Otherwise it is said, Feoffment is the total relinquishment and transfer of all rights of ownership of an estate in land from one individual, the feoffor, to another, the feoffee, in exchange for some valuable consideration. In such cases, the person entitled to grant an estate may do so for the use of another (a Lessor). Use and trust are rooted in medieval law and are a legal way to avoid feudal services due to one Lord by granting land for the use of another (Cestui que use) who owes nothing to the Lord (i.e. no services). This arrangement separated legal ownership from beneficial ownership. Furthermore, one who owns property for the use of another is obliged to fulfill their trust.

IX. Whereas diverse Lords of Mannours and others have granted Estates by Lease for the term of one life or more, And it hath often happened that such person for whose life such Estates have been granted have gone beyond the Seas or so absented themselves from this Realm for so many years that the Lessor(s) or person(s) entitled to have the property back (Reversioners) cannot find out whether cestui a que use le feoffment fuit fait be alive or dead. Otherwise it is said, Cestui que vies have gone beyond Seas, and Reversioners cannot find out whether they are alive or dead!

X. For remedy of which mischief “so frequently happening to Such Lessors and Reversioners, being held out of possession of their Tenements for many years”, if Cestui que vie remains beyond Sea for Seven Years together and provides no Proof of their Lives, then in every Action brought for the recovery of the said “Tenements” by the Lessors or Reversioners, the Judges before whom such Action shall be brought shall direct the Jury to give their Verdict as if the person so remaining beyond the Seas or otherwise absenting themself were naturally dead. Ego these public trustees abuse the law to execute the Lord of Manors in order to secure the estate of the child in trust to the benefit of the trustee for the term of the life of the person for whom such estates had been granted (cestui a que usage le feoffment fuit fait). That is how the government Lessors squat the estate of a sovereign Lord of woman born.

XI. As Cestui qui vie, I am the Lord; I am the accommodation party for my vessel shadow (“strawman”) and I am the sponsor for the credit on every instrument I endorse for my strawman. I am the source of the energy. I am the sponsor for the credit when the offeror passes over the promise to deliver the check or obligation and draws on me as though I am a bond in which the offeror overdrafts and I in turn loan him the value of the instrument of his offer to which he is now in bondage in accordance with Public Policy. I am the principal from which the interest accrues: the interest (being the product) which accrues from the principal (being myself) has returned to the principal (myself) for a public deduction (tax credit) for adjustment of the tax liabilities on the public/fiscal society.

XII. Acceptance: Rule 1: Do not hold the charge or you will fry on the chair. Rule 2: Pass the charge to a fiduciary entity to remove yourself from that liability by grounding the account and charging them with the charge, to discharge yourself. As the owner, you are not the holder-in-due-­course for the tax adjustment; the holder-in-due-course is the holder of a business license by being registered to operate in the industrial society, which is your fiduciary like the bank or a vendor.

XIII. A request is made against you without providing a check, thus it was an order for money/money order, that is why you RETURN (tax return) the offer after acceptance to the Offeror because the Offeror is holding your check as your fiduciary and they need to Pass Thru your account to make their check good which in turn reflects itself as a deduction to the entities tax liability making the credit memo to the account for the tax adjustment good, and allowing the release of the goods to the acceptor and now there is no debt claimed on the account. The ticket, bill or presentment is the instrument they use to make the claim against you; if you give them back the original and now it is in their possession, how can they possibly make a claim against you when they are in possession of their own bill. In other words it is said, An offer is made against you to pay, which debits your value and to balance that value, you need a credit. Your acceptance of their offer returned to them satisfies the Replevin Bond by operation (under the Grace of Public Policy H.J.R.-192). That is why you accept and return (tax return) the original, yourself being the sponsor for the credit to the account through your exemption. The reason you return the original is because what the person is doing is taxing you. When you return it, it is a tax return that is eligible for adjustment with the Internal Revenue Service.

XIV. Your inter-national (inter-n’al) court orders are the Acceptances because it turns those offers into money orders to use your exemption. When you accept and return an offer and they refuse to adjust, they are the ones who are in contempt of court, not you. The scriptures talk about a door that you can walk in and out of, well that is the door to the warehouse, it is the “Receiving & Discharge” door and it is “Your House,” because you are the one that is revenuing the currency from a public jurisdiction of debt back to your private jurisdiction of credit and effectively redeeming the debt. This is why we want the order of the court released to us; it is because it is our court we are exercising. The court/bank/corporation is using your exemption to write checks to them self by bonding against you to claim you as a dependant and an infidel that has to get locked up. If you stick strictly with the “where is my check?” attitude, they have to clean their books to meet their record keeping obligations. If you want to push paper, they will push paper. Only utilizing one side of the account (the paper pushing), the steamroller will get revved up. Operating in both sides of the account we have the paper and the oral proceedings. Learn to utilize both sides as the owner of the account. You are catching the corporation (your fiduciary employee) spending against you (in your “absence”) and they are trying to make you pay for what they did, when it is against Public Policy to make you pay in the first place. And for them to make a claim against you, they have to give you a check (the one you write about having not found in their offer) to post for their Replevin bond and when they don’t do that, they have no claim in fact because they didn’t post the reserves to indemnify their actions because you would endorse it back to them paid in full. When they fail to release the order of the court during your written correspondents with them after you have accepted, they are then in dishonor and lose their exemption and can have no claim.

XV. Root Policy is the linear algebra f of x from Notice to Data to Information to Knowledge; the Linear function f of thought. Squared Policy is the planar geometry f of x=y from Audit to Assessment to Assurance to Adjustment; the Planar function f of the word, i.e. the application of algebra over a field. This is the due process of Mind Software (Mindsoft) operation.

XVI. A Policy of Adjudgment arising out of any Policy of Assurance which is raised into Question shall issue from a just and equitable court of competent jurisdiction.